Does Attention Mechanism Possess the Feature of Human Reading? A Perspective of Sentiment Classification Task
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
[Purpose] To understand the meaning of a sentence, humans can focus on important words in the sentence, which reflects our eyes staying on each word in different gaze time or times. Thus, some studies utilize eye-tracking values to optimize the attention mechanism in deep learning models. But these studies lack to explain the rationality of this approach. Whether the attention mechanism possesses this feature of human reading needs to be explored. [Design/methodology/approach] We conducted experiments on a sentiment classification task. Firstly, we obtained eye-tracking values from two open-source eye-tracking corpora to describe the feature of human reading. Then, the machine attention values of each sentence were learned from a sentiment classification model. Finally, a comparison was conducted to analyze machine attention values and eye-tracking values. [Findings] Through experiments, we found the attention mechanism can focus on important words, such as adjectives, adverbs, and sentiment words, which are valuable for judging the sentiment of sentences on the sentiment classification task. It possesses the feature of human reading, focusing on important words in sentences when reading. Due to the insufficient learning of the attention mechanism, some words are wrongly focused. The eye-tracking values can help the attention mechanism correct this error and improve the model performance. [Originality/value] Our research not only provides a reasonable explanation for the study of using eye-tracking values to optimize the attention mechanism, but also provides new inspiration for the interpretability of attention mechanism.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2022.
Builds on
21 of 54 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
- 2018Explainable Prediction of Medical Codes from Clinical Textcited by 231
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 191
- 2018Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluationcited by 88
- 2019Do Attention Heads in BERT Track Syntactic Dependencies?cited by 87
- 2019Attention Interpretability Across NLP Taskscited by 71
9 more
- 2017Massive Exploration of Neural Machine Translation Architecturescited by 55
- 2020Improving Natural Language Processing Tasks with Human Gaze-Guided Neural Attentioncited by 45
- 2019exBERT: A Visual Analysis Tool to Explore Learned Representations in Transformers Modelscited by 33
- 2019Entity Recognition at First Sight: Improving NER with Eye Movement Informationcited by 26
- 2020Bridging Information-Seeking Human Gaze and Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 20
- 2021Human Attention in Fine-grained Classificationcited by 20
- 2017Leveraging Cognitive Features for Sentiment Analysiscited by 19
- 2020Enhancing Keyphrase Extraction from Microblogs using Human Reading Timecited by 6
- 2021Enhancing Keyphrase Extraction from Academic Articles with their Reference Informationcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.