mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Interpretable Temporal Properties from Positive Examples Only

arXiv 2209.02650 ↗First posted 6 Sep 2022cs.LO cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of explaining the temporal behavior of black-box systems using human-interpretable models. To this end, based on recent research trends, we rely on the fundamental yet interpretable models of deterministic finite automata (DFAs) and linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas. In contrast to most existing works for learning DFAs and LTL formulas, we rely on only positive examples. Our motivation is that negative examples are generally difficult to observe, in particular, from black-box systems. To learn meaningful models from positive examples only, we design algorithms that rely on conciseness and language minimality of models as regularizers. To this end, our algorithms adopt two approaches: a symbolic and a counterexample-guided one. While the symbolic approach exploits an efficient encoding of language minimality as a constraint satisfaction problem, the counterexample-guided one relies on generating suitable negative examples to prune the search. Both the approaches provide us with effective algorithms with theoretical guarantees on the learned models. To assess the effectiveness of our algorithms, we evaluate all of them on synthetic data.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2022.

Builds on

14 of 53 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Multi-shot ASP solving with clingocited by 115
  2. 2017Extracting Automata from Recurrent Neural Networks Using Queries and Counterexamplescited by 66
  3. 2018Learning Linear Temporal Propertiescited by 41
  4. 2017Symbolic LTLf Synthesiscited by 21
  5. 2020Interpretable Sequence Classification via Discrete Optimizationcited by 19
  6. 2020Active Task-Inference-Guided Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  7. 2017Efficient, Safe, and Probably Approximately Complete Learning of Action Modelscited by 16
  8. 2017Interpretable Apprenticeship Learning with Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 13
  9. 2020Explaining Multi-stage Tasks by Learning Temporal Logic Formulas from Suboptimal Demonstrationscited by 13
  10. 2018Information-Guided Temporal Logic Inference with Prior Knowledgecited by 12
  11. 2020Learning Interpretable Models in the Property Specification Languagecited by 11
  12. 2021Scalable Anytime Algorithms for Learning Fragments of Linear Temporal Logiccited by 9
2 more
  1. 2021Planning with Incomplete Information in Quantified Answer Set Programmingcited by 8
  2. 2019Graph Temporal Logic Inference for Classification and Identificationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

12 papers.