mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intrinsic fluctuations of reinforcement learning promote cooperation

arXiv 2209.01013 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2022cs.LG econ.GN nlin.AOcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we ask for and answer what makes classical temporal-difference reinforcement learning with epsilon-greedy strategies cooperative. Cooperating in social dilemma situations is vital for animals, humans, and machines. While evolutionary theory revealed a range of mechanisms promoting cooperation, the conditions under which agents learn to cooperate are contested. Here, we demonstrate which and how individual elements of the multi-agent learning setting lead to cooperation. We use the iterated Prisoner's dilemma with one-period memory as a testbed. Each of the two learning agents learns a strategy that conditions the following action choices on both agents' action choices of the last round. We find that next to a high caring for future rewards, a low exploration rate, and a small learning rate, it is primarily intrinsic stochastic fluctuations of the reinforcement learning process which double the final rate of cooperation to up to 80%. Thus, inherent noise is not a necessary evil of the iterative learning process. It is a critical asset for the learning of cooperation. However, we also point out the trade-off between a high likelihood of cooperative behavior and achieving this in a reasonable amount of time. Our findings are relevant for purposefully designing cooperative algorithms and regulating undesired collusive effects.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2022.

Builds on

18 of 83 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Learning with Opponent-Learning Awarenesscited by 218
  2. 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
  3. 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 167
  4. 2018Inequity aversion improves cooperation in intertemporal social dilemmascited by 106
  5. 2017A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriationcited by 68
  6. 2017Maintaining cooperation in complex social dilemmas using deep reinforcement learningcited by 48
  7. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning and its Neuroscientific Implicationscited by 33
  8. 2018Evolving intrinsic motivations for altruistic behaviorcited by 30
  9. 2017Statistical physics of human cooperationcited by 27
  10. 2017Consequentialist conditional cooperation in social dilemmas with imperfect informationcited by 23
  11. 2020Emergent Reciprocity and Team Formation from Randomized Uncertain Social Preferencescited by 21
  12. 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Multi-Agent Learning: Catastrophe Theory Meets Game Theorycited by 16
6 more
  1. 2020Learning to Resolve Alliance Dilemmas in Many-Player Zero-Sum Gamescited by 9
  2. 2018Deterministic limit of temporal difference reinforcement learning for stochastic gamescited by 5
  3. 2021Symmetric equilibrium of multi-agent reinforcement learning in repeated prisoner's dilemmacited by 4
  4. 2020Artificial Intelligence & Cooperationcited by 3
  5. 2021Modeling the effects of environmental and perceptual uncertainty using deterministic reinforcement learning dynamics with partial observabilitycited by 3
  6. 2014Learning dynamics explains human behavior in Prisoner's Dilemma on networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.