Intrinsic fluctuations of reinforcement learning promote cooperation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we ask for and answer what makes classical temporal-difference reinforcement learning with epsilon-greedy strategies cooperative. Cooperating in social dilemma situations is vital for animals, humans, and machines. While evolutionary theory revealed a range of mechanisms promoting cooperation, the conditions under which agents learn to cooperate are contested. Here, we demonstrate which and how individual elements of the multi-agent learning setting lead to cooperation. We use the iterated Prisoner's dilemma with one-period memory as a testbed. Each of the two learning agents learns a strategy that conditions the following action choices on both agents' action choices of the last round. We find that next to a high caring for future rewards, a low exploration rate, and a small learning rate, it is primarily intrinsic stochastic fluctuations of the reinforcement learning process which double the final rate of cooperation to up to 80%. Thus, inherent noise is not a necessary evil of the iterative learning process. It is a critical asset for the learning of cooperation. However, we also point out the trade-off between a high likelihood of cooperative behavior and achieving this in a reasonable amount of time. Our findings are relevant for purposefully designing cooperative algorithms and regulating undesired collusive effects.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2022.
Builds on
18 of 83 references.
References · 18
- 2017Learning with Opponent-Learning Awarenesscited by 218
- 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
- 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 167
- 2018Inequity aversion improves cooperation in intertemporal social dilemmascited by 106
- 2017A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriationcited by 68
- 2017Maintaining cooperation in complex social dilemmas using deep reinforcement learningcited by 48
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning and its Neuroscientific Implicationscited by 33
- 2018Evolving intrinsic motivations for altruistic behaviorcited by 30
- 2017Statistical physics of human cooperationcited by 27
- 2017Consequentialist conditional cooperation in social dilemmas with imperfect informationcited by 23
- 2020Emergent Reciprocity and Team Formation from Randomized Uncertain Social Preferencescited by 21
- 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Multi-Agent Learning: Catastrophe Theory Meets Game Theorycited by 16
6 more
- 2020Learning to Resolve Alliance Dilemmas in Many-Player Zero-Sum Gamescited by 9
- 2018Deterministic limit of temporal difference reinforcement learning for stochastic gamescited by 5
- 2021Symmetric equilibrium of multi-agent reinforcement learning in repeated prisoner's dilemmacited by 4
- 2020Artificial Intelligence & Cooperationcited by 3
- 2021Modeling the effects of environmental and perceptual uncertainty using deterministic reinforcement learning dynamics with partial observabilitycited by 3
- 2014Learning dynamics explains human behavior in Prisoner's Dilemma on networkscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.