mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Model Transparency and Interpretability : Survey and Application to the Insurance Industry

arXiv 2209.00562 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2022stat.ML cs.LG stat.OTcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of models, even if efficient, must be accompanied by an understanding at all levels of the process that transforms data (upstream and downstream). Thus, needs increase to define the relationships between individual data and the choice that an algorithm could make based on its analysis (e.g. the recommendation of one product or one promotional offer, or an insurance rate representative of the risk). Model users must ensure that models do not discriminate and that it is also possible to explain their results. This paper introduces the importance of model interpretation and tackles the notion of model transparency. Within an insurance context, it specifically illustrates how some tools can be used to enforce the control of actuarial models that can nowadays leverage on machine learning. On a simple example of loss frequency estimation in car insurance, we show the interest of some interpretability methods to adapt explanation to the target audience.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2022.

Builds on

22 of 56 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  7. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  8. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  9. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  10. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  11. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  12. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
10 more
  1. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  2. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  3. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
  4. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
  5. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  6. 2018A Simple and Effective Model-Based Variable Importance Measurecited by 50
  7. 2017Inverse Classification for Comparison-based Interpretability in Machine Learningcited by 49
  8. 2018Defining Locality for Surrogates in Post-hoc Interpretablitycited by 33
  9. 2018Explanations of model predictions with live and breakDown packagescited by 17
  10. 2019"Why Should You Trust My Explanation?" Understanding Uncertainty in LIME Explanationscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

5 papers.