Debiasing Word Embeddings with Nonlinear Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Debiasing word embeddings has been largely limited to individual and independent social categories. However, real-world corpora typically present multiple social categories that possibly correlate or intersect with each other. For instance, "hair weaves" is stereotypically associated with African American females, but neither African American nor females alone. Therefore, this work studies biases associated with multiple social categories: joint biases induced by the union of different categories and intersectional biases that do not overlap with the biases of the constituent categories. We first empirically observe that individual biases intersect non-trivially (i.e., over a one-dimensional subspace). Drawing from the intersectional theory in social science and the linguistic theory, we then construct an intersectional subspace to debias for multiple social categories using the nonlinear geometry of individual biases. Empirical evaluations corroborate the efficacy of our approach. Data and implementation code can be downloaded at https://github.com/GitHubLuCheng/Implementation-of-JoSEC-COLING-22.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2022.
Builds on
22 of 48 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
- 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
- 2019Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 203
- 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
- 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
10 more
- 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
- 2019Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 146
- 2019Assessing Social and Intersectional Biases in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 134
- 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
- 2021Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challengescited by 56
- 2021Measuring Fairness with Biased Rulers: A Survey on Quantifying Biases in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 20
- 2020Unequal Representations: Analyzing Intersectional Biases in Word Embeddings Using Representational Similarity Analysiscited by 12
- 2018Native Language Cognate Effects on Second Language Lexical Choicecited by 11
- 2020Autoencoding Improves Pre-trained Word Embeddingscited by 11
- 2022Toward Understanding Bias Correlations for Mitigation in NLPcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3.
3 papers.