mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems: A Landscape of Research

arXiv 2208.12061 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2022cs.IR cs.HCcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conversational recommender systems aim to interactively support online users in their information search and decision-making processes in an intuitive way. With the latest advances in voice-controlled devices, natural language processing, and AI in general, such systems received increased attention in recent years. Technically, conversational recommenders are usually complex multi-component applications and often consist of multiple machine learning models and a natural language user interface. Evaluating such a complex system in a holistic way can therefore be challenging, as it requires (i) the assessment of the quality of the different learning components, and (ii) the quality perception of the system as a whole by users. Thus, a mixed methods approach is often required, which may combine objective (computational) and subjective (perception-oriented) evaluation techniques. In this paper, we review common evaluation approaches for conversational recommender systems, identify possible limitations, and outline future directions towards more holistic evaluation practices.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

7 papers.