mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Achieving Fairness in Dermatological Disease Diagnosis through Automatic Weight Adjusting Federated Learning and Personalization

arXiv 2208.11187 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2022cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dermatological diseases pose a major threat to the global health, affecting almost one-third of the world's population. Various studies have demonstrated that early diagnosis and intervention are often critical to prognosis and outcome. To this end, the past decade has witnessed the rapid evolvement of deep learning based smartphone apps, which allow users to conveniently and timely identify issues that have emerged around their skins. In order to collect sufficient data needed by deep learning and at the same time protect patient privacy, federated learning is often used, where individual clients aggregate a global model while keeping datasets local. However, existing federated learning frameworks are mostly designed to optimize the overall performance, while common dermatological datasets are heavily imbalanced. When applying federated learning to such datasets, significant disparities in diagnosis accuracy may occur. To address such a fairness issue, this paper proposes a fairness-aware federated learning framework for dermatological disease diagnosis. The framework is divided into two stages: In the first in-FL stage, clients with different skin types are trained in a federated learning process to construct a global model for all skin types. An automatic weight aggregator is used in this process to assign higher weights to the client with higher loss, and the intensity of the aggregator is determined by the level of difference between losses. In the latter post-FL stage, each client fine-tune its personalized model based on the global model in the in-FL stage. To achieve better fairness, models from different epochs are selected for each client to keep the accuracy difference of different skin types within 0.05. Experiments indicate that our proposed framework effectively improves both fairness and accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2022.

Builds on

15 of 37 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
  3. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
  4. 2021Towards Personalized Federated Learningcited by 464
  5. 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 456
  6. 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 394
  7. 2015Federated Optimization:Distributed Optimization Beyond the Datacentercited by 195
  8. 2021Evaluating Deep Neural Networks Trained on Clinical Images in Dermatology with the Fitzpatrick 17k Datasetcited by 185
  9. 2022FairPrune: Achieving Fairness Through Pruning for Dermatological Disease Diagnosiscited by 59
  10. 2022Federated Contrastive Learning for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 33
  11. 2020Enabling On-Device CNN Training by Self-Supervised Instance Filtering and Error Map Pruningcited by 24
  12. 2022Federated Contrastive Learning for Dermatological Disease Diagnosis via On-device Learningcited by 21
3 more
  1. 2022Distributed Contrastive Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 16
  2. 2019A Smartphone-Based Skin Disease Classification Using MobileNet CNNcited by 6
  3. 2021Evaluating the fairness of fine-tuning strategies in self-supervised learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.