mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Estimating a potential without the agony of the partition function

arXiv 2208.09433 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating a Gibbs density function given a sample is an important problem in computational statistics and statistical learning. Although the well established maximum likelihood method is commonly used, it requires the computation of the partition function (i.e., the normalization of the density). This function can be easily calculated for simple low-dimensional problems but its computation is difficult or even intractable for general densities and high-dimensional problems. In this paper we propose an alternative approach based on Maximum A-Posteriori (MAP) estimators, we name Maximum Recovery MAP (MR-MAP), to derive estimators that do not require the computation of the partition function, and reformulate the problem as an optimization problem. We further propose a least-action type potential that allows us to quickly solve the optimization problem as a feed-forward hyperbolic neural network. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods on some standard data sets.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2022.

Builds on

23 of 54 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,223
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,028
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,686
  5. 2022data2vec: A General Framework for Self-supervised Learning in Speech, Vision and Languagecited by 721
  6. 2017Stable Architectures for Deep Neural Networkscited by 340
  7. 2020Deep Learning Techniques for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 290
  8. 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 206
  9. 2016Learning to Optimizecited by 195
  10. 2018Deep Neural Networks Motivated by Partial Differential Equationscited by 187
  11. 2019Symplectic Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 149
  12. 2020Learning Energy-Based Models by Diffusion Recovery Likelihoodcited by 122
11 more
  1. 2016Energy-based Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 119
  2. 2019AntisymmetricRNN: A Dynamical System View on Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 112
  3. 2017Learning Proximal Operators: Using Denoising Networks for Regularizing Inverse Imaging Problemscited by 107
  4. 2021PDE-GCN: Novel Architectures for Graph Neural Networks Motivated by Partial Differential Equationscited by 106
  5. 2018Neural Proximal Gradient Descent for Compressive Imagingcited by 46
  6. 2021End-to-end reconstruction meets data-driven regularization for inverse problemscited by 32
  7. 2021Solving Inverse Problems by Joint Posterior Maximization with Autoencoding Priorcited by 24
  8. 2020Deep Learning Methods for Solving Linear Inverse Problems: Research Directions and Paradigmscited by 16
  9. 2019Fully Hyperbolic Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 15
  10. 2022Explainable AI via Learning to Optimizecited by 14
  11. 2021Mimetic Neural Networks: A unified framework for Protein Design and Foldingcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.