Ensemble uncertainty as a criterion for dataset expansion in distinct bone segmentation from upper-body CT images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Purpose: The localisation and segmentation of individual bones is an important preprocessing step in many planning and navigation applications. It is, however, a time-consuming and repetitive task if done manually. This is true not only for clinical practice but also for the acquisition of training data. We therefore not only present an end-to-end learnt algorithm that is capable of segmenting 125 distinct bones in an upper-body CT, but also provide an ensemble-based uncertainty measure that helps to single out scans to enlarge the training dataset with. Methods We create fully automated end-to-end learnt segmentations using a neural network architecture inspired by the 3D-Unet and fully supervised training. The results are improved using ensembles and inference-time augmentation. We examine the relationship of ensemble-uncertainty to an unlabelled scan's prospective usefulness as part of the training dataset. Results: Our methods are evaluated on an in-house dataset of 16 upper-body CT scans with a resolution of SI2millimeter per dimension. Taking into account all 125 bones in our label set, our most successful ensemble achieves a median dice score coefficient of 0.83. We find a lack of correlation between a scan's ensemble uncertainty and its prospective influence on the accuracies achieved within an enlarged training set. At the same time, we show that the ensemble uncertainty correlates to the number of voxels that need manual correction after an initial automated segmentation, thus minimising the time required to finalise a new ground truth segmentation. Conclusion: In combination, scans with low ensemble uncertainty need less annotator time while yielding similar future DSC improvements. They are thus ideal candidates to enlarge a training set for upper-body distinct bone segmentation from CT scans.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2022.
Builds on
17 of 31 references.
References · 17
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
- 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 278
- 2019A Survey on Active Learning and Human-in-the-Loop Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 150
- 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 145
- 2018Efficient Active Learning for Image Classification and Segmentation using a Sample Selection and Conditional Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 74
- 2017NiftyNet: a deep-learning platform for medical imagingcited by 45
- 2018Brain Tumor Segmentation using an Ensemble of 3D U-Nets and Overall Survival Prediction using Radiomic Featurescited by 33
- 2020DeScarGAN: Disease-Specific Anomaly Detection with Weak Supervisioncited by 13
- 2019Active Learning for Segmentation Based on Bayesian Sample Queriescited by 12
5 more
- 2018Active Learning for Segmentation by Optimizing Content Information for Maximal Entropycited by 10
- 2020Multi-structure bone segmentation in pediatric MR images with combined regularization from shape priors and adversarial networkcited by 6
- 20203D Segmentation Networks for Excessive Numbers of Classes: Distinct Bone Segmentation in Upper Bodiescited by 4
- 2020Bone Segmentation in Contrast Enhanced Whole-Body Computed Tomographycited by 2
- 2018Spinal Cord Gray Matter-White Matter Segmentation on Magnetic Resonance AMIRA Images with MD-GRUcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.