mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Autism spectrum disorder classification based on interpersonal neural synchrony: Can classification be improved by dyadic neural biomarkers using unsupervised graph representation learning?

arXiv 2208.08902 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2022cs.LG eess.IVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research in machine learning for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) classification bears the promise to improve clinical diagnoses. However, recent studies in clinical imaging have shown the limited generalization of biomarkers across and beyond benchmark datasets. Despite increasing model complexity and sample size in neuroimaging, the classification performance of ASD remains far away from clinical application. This raises the question of how we can overcome these barriers to develop early biomarkers for ASD. One approach might be to rethink how we operationalize the theoretical basis of this disease in machine learning models. Here we introduced unsupervised graph representations that explicitly map the neural mechanisms of a core aspect of ASD, deficits in dyadic social interaction, as assessed by dual brain recordings, termed hyperscanning, and evaluated their predictive performance. The proposed method differs from existing approaches in that it is more suitable to capture social interaction deficits on a neural level and is applicable to young children and infants. First results from functional near-infrared spectroscopy data indicate potential predictive capacities of a task-agnostic, interpretable graph representation. This first effort to leverage interaction-related deficits on neural level to classify ASD may stimulate new approaches and methods to enhance existing models to achieve developmental ASD biomarkers in the future.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2022.

Builds on

9 of 32 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017graph2vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Graphscited by 230
  3. 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 201
  4. 2019ASAP: Adaptive Structure Aware Pooling for Learning Hierarchical Graph Representationscited by 156
  5. 2020Characteristic Functions on Graphs: Birds of a Feather, from Statistical Descriptors to Parametric Modelscited by 116
  6. 2016Time for a change: a tutorial for comparing multiple classifiers through Bayesian analysiscited by 93
  7. 2019Can we trust deep learning models diagnosis? The impact of domain shift in chest radiograph classificationcited by 57
  8. 2018Geometric Scattering for Graph Data Analysiscited by 49
  9. 2021Graph Embedding via Diffusion-Wavelets-Based Node Feature Distribution Characterizationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.