mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Generating Robust, Fair, and Emotion-Aware Explanations for Recommender Systems

arXiv 2208.08017 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2022cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As recommender systems become increasingly sophisticated and complex, they often suffer from lack of fairness and transparency. Providing robust and unbiased explanations for recommendations has been drawing more and more attention as it can help address these issues and improve trustworthiness and informativeness of recommender systems. However, despite the fact that such explanations are generated for humans who respond more strongly to messages with appropriate emotions, there is a lack of consideration for emotions when generating explanations for recommendations. Current explanation generation models are found to exaggerate certain emotions without accurately capturing the underlying tone or the meaning. In this paper, we propose a novel method based on a multi-head transformer, called Emotion-aware Transformer for Explainable Recommendation (EmoTER), to generate more robust, fair, and emotion-enhanced explanations. To measure the linguistic quality and emotion fairness of the generated explanations, we adopt both automatic text metrics and human perceptions for evaluation. Experiments on three widely-used benchmark datasets with multiple evaluation metrics demonstrate that EmoTER consistently outperforms the existing state-of-the-art explanation generation models in terms of text quality, explainability, and consideration for fairness to emotion distribution. Implementation of EmoTER will be released as an open-source toolkit to support further research.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2022.

Builds on

21 of 47 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  4. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  5. 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 479
  6. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  7. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  8. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  9. 2017Emotional Chatting Machine: Emotional Conversation Generation with Internal and External Memorycited by 167
  10. 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 159
  11. 2020Question and Answer Test-Train Overlap in Open-Domain Question Answering Datasetscited by 137
  12. 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
9 more
  1. 2021Personalized Transformer for Explainable Recommendationcited by 58
  2. 2017Word Affect Intensitiescited by 51
  3. 2017Affect-LM: A Neural Language Model for Customizable Affective Text Generationcited by 50
  4. 2019Affect-Driven Dialog Generationcited by 50
  5. 2020Adapting a Language Model for Controlled Affective Text Generationcited by 22
  6. 2021Generate Natural Language Explanations for Recommendationcited by 22
  7. 2017Affective Neural Response Generationcited by 17
  8. 2019EmotionX-IDEA: Emotion BERT -- an Affectional Model for Conversationcited by 13
  9. 2021EXTRA: Explanation Ranking Datasets for Explainable Recommendationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.