Bias amplification in experimental social networks is reduced by resampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large-scale social networks are thought to contribute to polarization by amplifying people's biases. However, the complexity of these technologies makes it difficult to identify the mechanisms responsible and to evaluate mitigation strategies. Here we show under controlled laboratory conditions that information transmission through social networks amplifies motivational biases on a simple perceptual decision-making task. Participants in a large behavioral experiment showed increased rates of biased decision-making when part of a social network relative to asocial participants, across 40 independently evolving populations. Drawing on techniques from machine learning and Bayesian statistics, we identify a simple adjustment to content-selection algorithms that is predicted to mitigate bias amplification. This algorithm generates a sample of perspectives from within an individual's network that is more representative of the population as a whole. In a second large experiment, this strategy reduced bias amplification while maintaining the benefits of information sharing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2022.
Builds on
2 of 51 references.
References · 2
- 2018Trends in the Diffusion of Misinformation on Social Mediacited by 25
- 2015The amplification of risk in experimental diffusion chainscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.