mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bias Reducing Multitask Learning on Mental Health Prediction

arXiv 2208.03621 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2022cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There has been an increase in research in developing machine learning models for mental health detection or prediction in recent years due to increased mental health issues in society. Effective use of mental health prediction or detection models can help mental health practitioners re-define mental illnesses more objectively than currently done, and identify illnesses at an earlier stage when interventions may be more effective. However, there is still a lack of standard in evaluating bias in such machine learning models in the field, which leads to challenges in providing reliable predictions and in addressing disparities. This lack of standards persists due to factors such as technical difficulties, complexities of high dimensional clinical health data, etc., which are especially true for physiological signals. This along with prior evidence of relations between some physiological signals with certain demographic identities restates the importance of exploring bias in mental health prediction models that utilize physiological signals. In this work, we aim to perform a fairness analysis and implement a multi-task learning based bias mitigation method on anxiety prediction models using ECG data. Our method is based on the idea of epistemic uncertainty and its relationship with model weights and feature space representation. Our analysis showed that our anxiety prediction base model introduced some bias with regards to age, income, ethnicity, and whether a participant is born in the U.S. or not, and our bias mitigation method performed better at reducing the bias in the model, when compared to the reweighting mitigation technique. Our analysis on feature importance also helped identify relationships between heart rate variability and multiple demographic groupings.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2022.

Builds on

17 of 43 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  5. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  6. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  7. 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
  8. 2019Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 57
  9. 2020Empirical observation of negligible fairness-accuracy trade-offs in machine learning for public policycited by 44
  10. 2018Contemplating Visual Emotions: Understanding and Overcoming Dataset Biascited by 41
  11. 2018Taking Advantage of Multitask Learning for Fair Classificationcited by 24
  12. 2020How fair can we go in machine learning? Assessing the boundaries of fairness in decision treescited by 22
5 more
  1. 2021Responsible AI: Gender bias assessment in emotion recognitioncited by 22
  2. 2020Deep Bayesian Gaussian Processes for Uncertainty Estimation in Electronic Health Recordscited by 16
  3. 2020TILES-2018, a longitudinal physiologic and behavioral data set of hospital workerscited by 13
  4. 2021Towards Unbiased Visual Emotion Recognition via Causal Interventioncited by 11
  5. 2021Towards Fair Affective Robotics: Continual Learning for Mitigating Bias in Facial Expression and Action Unit Recognitioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 6; 2025: 1.

9 papers.