Pedestrian-Robot Interactions on Autonomous Crowd Navigation: Reactive Control Methods and Evaluation Metrics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous navigation in highly populated areas remains a challenging task for robots because of the difficulty in guaranteeing safe interactions with pedestrians in unstructured situations. In this work, we present a crowd navigation control framework that delivers continuous obstacle avoidance and post-contact control evaluated on an autonomous personal mobility vehicle. We propose evaluation metrics for accounting efficiency, controller response and crowd interactions in natural crowds. We report the results of over 110 trials in different crowd types: sparse, flows, and mixed traffic, with low- (< 0.15 ppsm), mid- (< 0.65 ppsm), and high- (< 1 ppsm) pedestrian densities. We present comparative results between two low-level obstacle avoidance methods and a baseline of shared control. Results show a 10% drop in relative time to goal on the highest density tests, and no other efficiency metric decrease. Moreover, autonomous navigation showed to be comparable to shared-control navigation with a lower relative jerk and significantly higher fluency in commands indicating high compatibility with the crowd. We conclude that the reactive controller fulfils a necessary task of fast and continuous adaptation to crowd navigation, and it should be coupled with high-level planners for environmental and situational awareness.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2022.
Builds on
11 of 28 references.
References · 11
- 2018Crowd-Robot Interaction: Crowd-aware Robot Navigation with Attention-based Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 162
- 2018PORCA: Modeling and Planning for Autonomous Driving among Many Pedestrianscited by 36
- 2020DenseCAvoid: Real-time Navigation in Dense Crowds using Anticipatory Behaviorscited by 25
- 2018HyP-DESPOT: A Hybrid Parallel Algorithm for Online Planning under Uncertaintycited by 18
- 2020DR-SPAAM: A Spatial-Attention and Auto-regressive Model for Person Detection in 2D Range Datacited by 18
- 2020Frozone: Freezing-Free, Pedestrian-Friendly Navigation in Human Crowdscited by 14
- 2021Crowd against the machine: A simulation-based benchmark tool to evaluate and compare robot capabilities to navigate a human crowdcited by 4
- 2021Person-MinkUNet: 3D Person Detection with LiDAR Point Cloudcited by 3
- 2022Unfreezing Social Navigation: Dynamical Systems based Compliance for Contact Control in Robot Navigationcited by 3
- 2022Personal Mobility With Synchronous Trunk-Knee Passive Exoskeleton: Optimizing Human-Robot Energy Transfercited by 2
- 2020Control Interface for Hands-free Navigation of Standing Mobility Vehicles based on Upper-Body Natural Movementscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023TBD Pedestrian Data Collection: Towards Rich, Portable, and Large-Scale Natural Pedestrian Datacited by 5
- 2025Aion: Towards Hierarchical 4D Scene Graphs with Temporal Flow Dynamicscited by 5
- 2026Rheos: Modelling Continuous Motion Dynamics in Hierarchical 3D Scene Graphscited by 2
- 2023Learning Contact-based Navigation in Crowdscited by 0
- 2025Shared Control of Holonomic Wheelchairs through Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Rheos: Modelling Continuous Motion Dynamics in Hierarchical 3D Scene Graphs9 Mar 2026
- 2025Aion: Towards Hierarchical 4D Scene Graphs with Temporal Flow Dynamics10 Dec 2025
- 2025Shared Control of Holonomic Wheelchairs through Reinforcement Learning22 Jul 2025
- 2023TBD Pedestrian Data Collection: Towards Rich, Portable, and Large-Scale Natural Pedestrian Data29 Sep 2023
- 2023Learning Contact-based Navigation in Crowds2 Mar 2023