A New Implementation of Federated Learning for Privacy and Security Enhancement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Motivated by the ever-increasing concerns on personal data privacy and the rapidly growing data volume at local clients, federated learning (FL) has emerged as a new machine learning setting. An FL system is comprised of a central parameter server and multiple local clients. It keeps data at local clients and learns a centralized model by sharing the model parameters learned locally. No local data needs to be shared, and privacy can be well protected. Nevertheless, since it is the model instead of the raw data that is shared, the system can be exposed to the poisoning model attacks launched by malicious clients. Furthermore, it is challenging to identify malicious clients since no local client data is available on the server. Besides, membership inference attacks can still be performed by using the uploaded model to estimate the client's local data, leading to privacy disclosure. In this work, we first propose a model update based federated averaging algorithm to defend against Byzantine attacks such as additive noise attacks and sign-flipping attacks. The individual client model initialization method is presented to provide further privacy protections from the membership inference attacks by hiding the individual local machine learning model. When combining these two schemes, privacy and security can be both effectively enhanced. The proposed schemes are proved to converge experimentally under non-IID data distribution when there are no attacks. Under Byzantine attacks, the proposed schemes perform much better than the classical model based FedAvg algorithm.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2022.
Builds on
9 of 11 references.
References · 9
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
- 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 317
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 255
- 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
- 2020Learning to Detect Malicious Clients for Robust Federated Learningcited by 88
- 2020Harnessing Wireless Channels for Scalable and Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023MIA-BAD: An Approach for Enhancing Membership Inference Attack and its Mitigation with Federated Learning
- 2023A Survey of What to Share in Federated Learning: Perspectives on Model Utility, Privacy Leakage, and Communication Efficiency
- 2024Privacy in Federated Learning
- 2024FedMIA: An Effective Membership Inference Attack Exploiting "All for One" Principle in Federated Learning
- 2023Active Membership Inference Attack under Local Differential Privacy in Federated Learning
- 2023Privacy and Accuracy Implications of Model Complexity and Integration in Heterogeneous Federated Learning
- 2024No Vandalism: Privacy-Preserving and Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning
- 2023FedBayes: A Zero-Trust Federated Learning Aggregation to Defend Against Adversarial Attacks