mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Open-radiomics: A Collection of Standardized Datasets and a Technical Protocol for Reproducible Radiomics Machine Learning Pipelines

arXiv 2207.14776 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2022q-bio.QM cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: As an important branch of machine learning pipelines in medical imaging, radiomics faces two major challenges namely reproducibility and accessibility. In this work, we introduce open-radiomics, a set of radiomics datasets along with a comprehensive radiomics pipeline based on our proposed technical protocol to improve the reproducibility of the results. Methods: We curated large-scale radiomics datasets based on three open-source datasets; BraTS 2020 for high-grade glioma (HGG) versus low-grade glioma (LGG) classification and survival analysis, BraTS 2023 for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase classification, and non-small cell lung cancer survival analysis from the Cancer Imaging Archive. Using BraTS 2020 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) dataset, we applied our protocol to 369 brain tumor patients (76 LGG, 293 HGG). Leveraging PyRadiomics for LGG vs. HGG classification, we generated 288 datasets from 4 MRI sequences, 3 binWidths, 6 normalization methods, and 4 tumor subregions. Random Forest classifiers were trained and validated (60%,20%,20%) across 100 different data splits (28,800 test results), evaluating Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC). Results: Unlike binWidth and image normalization, tumor subregion and imaging sequence significantly affected performance of the models. T1 contrast-enhanced sequence and the union of Necrotic and the non-enhancing tumor core subregions resulted in the highest AUROCs (average test AUROC 0.951, 95% confidence interval of (0.949, 0.952)). Although several settings and data splits (28 out of 28800) yielded test AUROC of 1, they were irreproducible. Conclusion: Our experiments demonstrate the sources of variability in radiomics pipelines (e.g., tumor subregion) can have a significant impact on the results, which may lead to superficial perfect performances that are irreproducible.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2022.

Builds on

7 of 56 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 508
  2. 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 507
  3. 2016Image biomarker standardisation initiativecited by 61
  4. 2018Evaluating the Impact of Intensity Normalization on MR Image Synthesiscited by 26
  5. 2018Repeatability of Multiparametric Prostate MRI Radiomics Featurescited by 6
  6. 2020A Modified AUC for Training Convolutional Neural Networks: Taking Confidence into Accountcited by 5
  7. 2019Improving Prognostic Performance in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma using Radiomics and Deep Learning Features Fusion in CT Imagescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.