mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Survey of Learning on Small Data: Generalization, Optimization, and Challenge

arXiv 2207.14443 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2022cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning on big data brings success for artificial intelligence (AI), but the annotation and training costs are expensive. In future, learning on small data that approximates the generalization ability of big data is one of the ultimate purposes of AI, which requires machines to recognize objectives and scenarios relying on small data as humans. A series of learning topics is going on this way such as active learning and few-shot learning. However, there are few theoretical guarantees for their generalization performance. Moreover, most of their settings are passive, that is, the label distribution is explicitly controlled by finite training resources from known distributions. This survey follows the agnostic active sampling theory under a PAC (Probably Approximately Correct) framework to analyze the generalization error and label complexity of learning on small data in model-agnostic supervised and unsupervised fashion. Considering multiple learning communities could produce small data representation and related topics have been well surveyed, we thus subjoin novel geometric representation perspectives for small data: the Euclidean and non-Euclidean (hyperbolic) mean, where the optimization solutions including the Euclidean gradients, non-Euclidean gradients, and Stein gradient are presented and discussed. Later, multiple learning communities that may be improved by learning on small data are summarized, which yield data-efficient representations, such as transfer learning, contrastive learning, graph representation learning. Meanwhile, we find that the meta-learning may provide effective parameter update policies for learning on small data. Then, we explore multiple challenging scenarios for small data, such as the weak supervision and multi-label. Finally, multiple data applications that may benefit from efficient small data representation are surveyed.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 97 of its 197 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2022.

Builds on

97 of 197 references.

References · 97

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  5. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  6. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  7. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  8. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  9. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  10. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  11. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
  12. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
38 more
  1. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  2. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  3. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
  4. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
  5. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,139
  6. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  7. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
  8. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
  9. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  10. 2021GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 890
  11. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 806
  12. 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 792
  13. 2020Efficient Transformers: A Surveycited by 784
  14. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
  15. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
  16. 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 619
  17. 2019Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradientscited by 523
  18. 2017A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networkscited by 510
  19. 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
  20. 2016Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithmcited by 498
  21. 2017A Brief Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 466
  22. 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 456
  23. 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 400
  24. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
  25. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 366
  26. 2020Debiased Contrastive Learningcited by 354
  27. 2015Diffusion-Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 268
  28. 2018What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?cited by 250
  29. 2019Hyperbolic Graph Neural Networkscited by 244
  30. 2016A Kernelized Stein Discrepancy for Goodness-of-fit Tests and Model Evaluationcited by 236
  31. 2019Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable Modelcited by 228
  32. 2020Bilevel Optimization: Convergence Analysis and Enhanced Designcited by 219
  33. 2020Rethinking the Value of Labels for Improving Class-Imbalanced Learningcited by 216
  34. 2017CayleyNets: Graph Convolutional Neural Networks with Complex Rational Spectral Filterscited by 203
  35. 2018An Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 201
  36. 2016Deep Information Propagationcited by 194
  37. 2017Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 178
  38. 2017Learning to Plan Chemical Synthesescited by 175

50 most cited of 97 All 97 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.