Fault Detection and Classification of Aerospace Sensors using a VGG16-based Deep Neural Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compared with traditional model-based fault detection and classification (FDC) methods, deep neural networks (DNN) prove to be effective for the aerospace sensors FDC problems. However, time being consumed in training the DNN is excessive, and explainability analysis for the FDC neural network is still underwhelming. A concept known as imagefication-based intelligent FDC has been studied in recent years. This concept advocates to stack the sensors measurement data into an image format, the sensors FDC issue is then transformed to abnormal regions detection problem on the stacked image, which may well borrow the recent advances in the machine vision vision realm. Although promising results have been claimed in the imagefication-based intelligent FDC researches, due to the low size of the stacked image, small convolutional kernels and shallow DNN layers were used, which hinders the FDC performance. In this paper, we first propose a data augmentation method which inflates the stacked image to a larger size (correspondent to the VGG16 net developed in the machine vision realm). The FDC neural network is then trained via fine-tuning the VGG16 directly. To truncate and compress the FDC net size (hence its running time), we perform model pruning on the fine-tuned net. Class activation mapping (CAM) method is also adopted for explainability analysis of the FDC net to verify its internal operations. Via data augmentation, fine-tuning from VGG16, and model pruning, the FDC net developed in this paper claims an FDC accuracy 98.90% across 4 aircraft at 5 flight conditions (running time 26 ms). The CAM results also verify the FDC net w.r.t. its internal operations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2022.
Builds on
22 of 77 references.
References · 22
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
- 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,129
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
10 more
- 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 673
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
- 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 438
- 2013Predicting Parameters in Deep Learningcited by 223
- 2019Smooth Grad-CAM++: An Enhanced Inference Level Visualization Technique for Deep Convolutional Neural Network Modelscited by 118
- 2020SS-CAM: Smoothed Score-CAM for Sharper Visual Feature Localizationcited by 46
- 2022Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Neural Network Pruningcited by 42
- 2018Recovering from Random Pruning: On the Plasticity of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2016Robust Air Data Sensor Fault Diagnosis With Enhanced Fault Sensitivity Using Moving Horizon Estimationcited by 2
- 2016Implementation of real-time moving horizon estimation for robust air data sensor fault diagnosis in the RECONFIGURE benchmarkcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.