Complementing Semi-Supervised Learning with Uncertainty Quantification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of fully supervised classification is that it requires a tremendous amount of annotated data, however, in many datasets a large portion of data is unlabeled. To alleviate this problem semi-supervised learning (SSL) leverages the knowledge of the classifier on the labeled domain and extrapolates it to the unlabeled domain which has a supposedly similar distribution as annotated data. Recent success on SSL methods crucially hinges on thresholded pseudo labeling and thereby consistency regularization for the unlabeled domain. However, the existing methods do not incorporate the uncertainty of the pseudo labels or unlabeled samples in the training process which are due to the noisy labels or out of distribution samples owing to strong augmentations. Inspired by the recent developments in SSL, our goal in this paper is to propose a novel unsupervised uncertainty-aware objective that relies on aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty quantification. Complementing the recent techniques in SSL with the proposed uncertainty-aware loss function our approach outperforms or is on par with the state-of-the-art over standard SSL benchmarks while being computationally lightweight. Our results outperform the state-of-the-art results on complex datasets such as CIFAR-100 and Mini-ImageNet.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2022.
Builds on
25 of 41 references.
References · 25
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,255
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
- 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
- 2017Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning resultscited by 472
13 more
- 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
- 2015Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 295
- 2019Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 289
- 2019Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 251
- 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
- 2018Deep Co-Training for Semi-Supervised Image Recognitioncited by 147
- 2018Fast and Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning by Weight-Perturbation in Adamcited by 131
- 2017Good Semi-supervised Learning that Requires a Bad GANcited by 86
- 2018Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for Batch Normalized Deep Networkscited by 70
- 2021SimPLE: Similar Pseudo Label Exploitation for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 68
- 2020FeatMatch: Feature-Based Augmentation for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 57
- 2017Low-shot learning with large-scale diffusioncited by 33
- 2016Mutual Exclusivity Loss for Semi-Supervised Deep Learningcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.