Deep Preconditioners and their application to seismic wavefield processing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Seismic data processing heavily relies on the solution of physics-driven inverse problems. In the presence of unfavourable data acquisition conditions (e.g., regular or irregular coarse sampling of sources and/or receivers), the underlying inverse problem becomes very ill-posed and prior information is required to obtain a satisfactory solution. Sparsity-promoting inversion, coupled with fixed-basis sparsifying transforms, represent the go-to approach for many processing tasks due to its simplicity of implementation and proven successful application in a variety of acquisition scenarios. Leveraging the ability of deep neural networks to find compact representations of complex, multi-dimensional vector spaces, we propose to train an AutoEncoder network to learn a direct mapping between the input seismic data and a representative latent manifold. The trained decoder is subsequently used as a nonlinear preconditioner for the physics-driven inverse problem at hand. Synthetic and field data are presented for a variety of seismic processing tasks and the proposed nonlinear, learned transformations are shown to outperform fixed-basis transforms and convergence faster to the sought solution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2022.
Builds on
24 of 81 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
- 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,097
- 2020Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastivecited by 693
- 2018Improving Unsupervised Defect Segmentation by Applying Structural Similarity to Autoencoderscited by 263
12 more
- 2017Super-Convergence: Very Fast Training of Neural Networks Using Large Learning Ratescited by 196
- 2017Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networkscited by 145
- 2018NETT: Solving Inverse Problems with Deep Neural Networkscited by 89
- 2019Deep-learning inversion: a next generation seismic velocity-model building methodcited by 48
- 2018Stochastic seismic waveform inversion using generative adversarial networks as a geological priorcited by 47
- 2021MLReal: Bridging the gap between training on synthetic data and real data applications in machine learningcited by 19
- 2019Interpolation and Denoising of Seismic Data using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2019Semi-supervised Learning for Acoustic Impedance Inversioncited by 8
- 2022A hybrid approach to seismic deblending: when physics meets self-supervisioncited by 4
- 2020Sparse aNETT for Solving Inverse Problems with Deep Learningcited by 2
- 2019Seismic data denoising and deblending using deep learningcited by 1
- 2021Anti-Aliasing Add-On for Deep Prior Seismic Data Interpolationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.