mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Regret Minimization with Noisy Observations

arXiv 2207.09435 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2022cs.DS cs.GT cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a typical optimization problem, the task is to pick one of a number of options with the lowest cost or the highest value. In practice, these cost/value quantities often come through processes such as measurement or machine learning, which are noisy, with quantifiable noise distributions. To take these noise distributions into account, one approach is to assume a prior for the values, use it to build a posterior, and then apply standard stochastic optimization to pick a solution. However, in many practical applications, such prior distributions may not be available. In this paper, we study such scenarios using a regret minimization model. In our model, the task is to pick the highest one out of n values. The values are unknown and chosen by an adversary, but can be observed through noisy channels, where additive noises are stochastically drawn from known distributions. The goal is to minimize the regret of our selection, defined as the expected difference between the highest and the selected value on the worst-case choices of values. We show that the na"ive algorithm of picking the highest observed value has regret arbitrarily worse than the optimum, even when n = 2 and the noises are unbiased in expectation. On the other hand, we propose an algorithm which gives a constant-approximation to the optimal regret for any n. Our algorithm is conceptually simple, computationally efficient, and requires only minimal knowledge of the noise distributions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2022.

Builds on

10 of 52 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  2. 2020Fair for All: Best-effort Fairness Guarantees for Classificationcited by 8
  3. 2016Parallel Algorithms for Select and Partition with Noisy Comparisonscited by 6
  4. 2015Randomization beats Second Price as a Prior-Independent Auctioncited by 5
  5. 2020Predict and Match: Prophet Inequalities with Uncertain Supplycited by 3
  6. 2018Instance-Optimality in the Noisy Value-and Comparison-Model --- Accept, Accept, Strong Accept: Which Papers get in?cited by 2
  7. 2020Benchmark Design and Prior-independent Optimizationcited by 2
  8. 2021Optimal Algorithms for Multiwinner Elections and the Chamberlin-Courant Rulecited by 2
  9. 2018A Simple Mechanism for a Budget-Constrained Buyercited by 1
  10. 2019Online Stochastic Matching with Edge Arrivalscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.