Benchmark Design and Prior-independent Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper compares two leading approaches for robust optimization in the models of online algorithms and mechanism design. Competitive analysis compares the performance of an online algorithm to an offline benchmark in worst-case over inputs, and prior-independent mechanism design compares the expected performance of a mechanism on an unknown distribution (of inputs, i.e., agent values) to the optimal mechanism for the distribution in worst case over distributions. For competitive analysis, a critical concern is the choice of benchmark. This paper gives a method for selecting a good benchmark. We show that optimal algorithm/mechanism for the optimal benchmark are equal to the prior-independent optimal algorithm/mechanism. We solve a central open question in prior-independent mechanism design, namely we identify the prior-independent revenue-optimal mechanism for selling a single item to two agents with i.i.d. and regularly distributed values. Via this solution and the above equivalence of prior-independent mechanism design and competitive analysis (a.k.a. prior-free mechanism design) we show that the standard method for lower bounds of prior-free mechanisms is not generally tight for the benchmark design program.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Algorithmic Robust Forecast Aggregationcited by 5
- 2022Regret Minimization with Noisy Observationscited by 0
- 2024Algorithmic Robust Forecast Aggregation31 Jan 2024
- 2022Regret Minimization with Noisy Observations19 Jul 2022