mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A coherence parameter characterizing generative compressed sensing with Fourier measurements

arXiv 2207.09340 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2022cs.IT cs.LG eess.SPcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Bora et al. (2017), a mathematical framework was developed for compressed sensing guarantees in the setting where the measurement matrix is Gaussian and the signal structure is the range of a generative neural network (GNN). The problem of compressed sensing with GNNs has since been extensively analyzed when the measurement matrix and/or network weights follow a subgaussian distribution. We move beyond the subgaussian assumption, to measurement matrices that are derived by sampling uniformly at random rows of a unitary matrix (including subsampled Fourier measurements as a special case). Specifically, we prove the first known restricted isometry guarantee for generative compressed sensing with subsampled isometries and provide recovery bounds, addressing an open problem of Scarlett et al. (2022, p. 10). Recovery efficacy is characterized by the coherence, a new parameter, which measures the interplay between the range of the network and the measurement matrix. Our approach relies on subspace counting arguments and ideas central to high-dimensional probability. Furthermore, we propose a regularization strategy for training GNNs to have favourable coherence with the measurement operator. We provide compelling numerical simulations that support this regularized training strategy: our strategy yields low coherence networks that require fewer measurements for signal recovery. This, together with our theoretical results, supports coherence as a natural quantity for characterizing generative compressed sensing with subsampled isometries.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2022.

Builds on

22 of 67 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  4. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
  5. 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,097
  6. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
  7. 2017Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 337
  8. 2021Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative Priorscited by 284
  9. 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 187
  10. 2017Bounding and Counting Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 161
  11. 2018Deep Decoder: Concise Image Representations from Untrained Non-convolutional Networkscited by 120
  12. 2018Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Priorcited by 73
10 more
  1. 2017Global Guarantees for Enforcing Deep Generative Priors by Empirical Riskcited by 37
  2. 2019Information-Theoretic Lower Bounds for Compressive Sensing with Generative Modelscited by 25
  3. 2022Theoretical Perspectives on Deep Learning Methods in Inverse Problemscited by 22
  4. 2019Global Guarantees for Blind Demodulation with Generative Priorscited by 11
  5. 2022Non-Iterative Recovery from Nonlinear Observations using Generative Modelscited by 9
  6. 2019Structure Preserving Compressive Sensing MRI Reconstruction using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 8
  7. 2015The Restricted Isometry Property of Subsampled Fourier Matricescited by 7
  8. 2020Sub-Gaussian Matrices on Sets: Optimal Tail Dependence and Applicationscited by 5
  9. 2021Beyond Independent Measurements: General Compressed Sensing with GNN Applicationcited by 5
  10. 2022GenMod: A generative modeling approach for spectral representation of PDEs with random inputscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

8 papers.