mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Modeling Quality and Machine Learning Pipelines through Extended Feature Models

arXiv 2207.07528 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2022cs.SE cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recently increased complexity of Machine Learning (ML) methods, led to the necessity to lighten both the research and industry development processes. ML pipelines have become an essential tool for experts of many domains, data scientists and researchers, allowing them to easily put together several ML models to cover the full analytic process starting from raw datasets. Over the years, several solutions have been proposed to automate the building of ML pipelines, most of them focused on semantic aspects and characteristics of the input dataset. However, an approach taking into account the new quality concerns needed by ML systems (like fairness, interpretability, privacy, etc.) is still missing. In this paper, we first identify, from the literature, key quality attributes of ML systems. Further, we propose a new engineering approach for quality ML pipeline by properly extending the Feature Models meta-model. The presented approach allows to model ML pipelines, their quality requirements (on the whole pipeline and on single phases), and quality characteristics of algorithms used to implement each pipeline phase. Finally, we demonstrate the expressiveness of our model considering the classification problem.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2022.

Builds on

14 of 55 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  4. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  5. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  6. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
  7. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  8. 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 213
  9. 2021Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Surveycited by 68
  10. 2020Towards CRISP-ML(Q): A Machine Learning Process Model with Quality Assurance Methodologycited by 41
  11. 2020Engineering AI Systems: A Research Agendacited by 37
  12. 2020A Software Engineering Perspective on Engineering Machine Learning Systems: State of the Art and Challengescited by 33
2 more
  1. 2022Blackbox Post-Processing for Multiclass Fairnesscited by 14
  2. 2021Software Architecture for ML-based Systems: What Exists and What Lies Aheadcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

2 papers.