mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Overview of Abusive and Threatening Language Detection in Urdu at FIRE 2021

arXiv 2207.06710 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2022cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the growth of social media platform influence, the effect of their misuse becomes more and more impactful. The importance of automatic detection of threatening and abusive language can not be overestimated. However, most of the existing studies and state-of-the-art methods focus on English as the target language, with limited work on low- and medium-resource languages. In this paper, we present two shared tasks of abusive and threatening language detection for the Urdu language which has more than 170 million speakers worldwide. Both are posed as binary classification tasks where participating systems are required to classify tweets in Urdu into two classes, namely: (i) Abusive and Non-Abusive for the first task, and (ii) Threatening and Non-Threatening for the second. We present two manually annotated datasets containing tweets labelled as (i) Abusive and Non-Abusive, and (ii) Threatening and Non-Threatening. The abusive dataset contains 2400 annotated tweets in the train part and 1100 annotated tweets in the test part. The threatening dataset contains 6000 annotated tweets in the train part and 3950 annotated tweets in the test part. We also provide logistic regression and BERT-based baseline classifiers for both tasks. In this shared task, 21 teams from six countries registered for participation (India, Pakistan, China, Malaysia, United Arab Emirates, and Taiwan), 10 teams submitted their runs for Subtask A, which is Abusive Language Detection and 9 teams submitted their runs for Subtask B, which is Threatening Language detection, and seven teams submitted their technical reports. The best performing system achieved an F1-score value of 0.880 for Subtask A and 0.545 for Subtask B. For both subtasks, m-Bert based transformer model showed the best performance.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2022.

Builds on

13 of 52 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  4. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  5. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 270
  6. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 210
  7. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 207
  8. 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 140
  9. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020)cited by 138
  10. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 116
  11. 2021Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2020: Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification in Indo-European Languagescited by 38
  12. 2017Deep Learning for User Comment Moderationcited by 18
1 more
  1. 2021Graph embeddings for Abusive Language Detectioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

5 papers.