mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Estimating Test Performance for AI Medical Devices under Distribution Shift with Conformal Prediction

arXiv 2207.05796 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2022cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating the test performance of software AI-based medical devices under distribution shifts is crucial for evaluating the safety, efficiency, and usability prior to clinical deployment. Due to the nature of regulated medical device software and the difficulty in acquiring large amounts of labeled medical datasets, we consider the task of predicting the test accuracy of an arbitrary black-box model on an unlabeled target domain without modification to the original training process or any distributional assumptions of the original source data (i.e. we treat the model as a "black-box" and only use the predicted output responses). We propose a "black-box" test estimation technique based on conformal prediction and evaluate it against other methods on three medical imaging datasets (mammography, dermatology, and histopathology) under several clinically relevant types of distribution shift (institution, hardware scanner, atlas, hospital). We hope that by promoting practical and effective estimation techniques for black-box models, manufacturers of medical devices will develop more standardized and realistic evaluation procedures to improve the robustness and trustworthiness of clinical AI tools.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2022.

Builds on

17 of 22 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  3. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
  4. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  5. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
  6. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 582
  7. 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
  8. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
  9. 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
  10. 2016Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levelscited by 272
  11. 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 200
  12. 2021Evaluating Deep Neural Networks Trained on Clinical Images in Dermatology with the Fitzpatrick 17k Datasetcited by 185
5 more
  1. 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 145
  2. 2018Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objectscited by 143
  3. 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
  4. 2021Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for classification under label shiftcited by 101
  5. 2021Extending the WILDS Benchmark for Unsupervised Adaptationcited by 86

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.