mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards the Use of Saliency Maps for Explaining Low-Quality Electrocardiograms to End Users

arXiv 2207.02726 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When using medical images for diagnosis, either by clinicians or artificial intelligence (AI) systems, it is important that the images are of high quality. When an image is of low quality, the medical exam that produced the image often needs to be redone. In telemedicine, a common problem is that the quality issue is only flagged once the patient has left the clinic, meaning they must return in order to have the exam redone. This can be especially difficult for people living in remote regions, who make up a substantial portion of the patients at Portal Telemedicina, a digital healthcare organization based in Brazil. In this paper, we report on ongoing work regarding (i) the development of an AI system for flagging and explaining low-quality medical images in real-time, (ii) an interview study to understand the explanation needs of stakeholders using the AI system at OurCompany, and, (iii) a longitudinal user study design to examine the effect of including explanations on the workflow of the technicians in our clinics. To the best of our knowledge, this would be the first longitudinal study on evaluating the effects of XAI methods on end-users -- stakeholders that use AI systems but do not have AI-specific expertise. We welcome feedback and suggestions on our experimental setup.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2022.

Builds on

20 of 48 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  5. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  6. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
  7. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  8. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  9. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 260
  10. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 211
  11. 2016Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?cited by 161
  12. 2019What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Usecited by 135
8 more
  1. 2019Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms during Medical Decision-Makingcited by 109
  2. 2022Rethinking Explainability as a Dialogue: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 52
  3. 2019FOCUS: Flexible Optimizable Counterfactual Explanations for Tree Ensemblescited by 43
  4. 2020CheXplain: Enabling Physicians to Explore and UnderstandData-Driven, AI-Enabled Medical Imaging Analysiscited by 40
  5. 2021Designing AI for Trust and Collaboration in Time-Constrained Medical Decisions: A Sociotechnical Lenscited by 35
  6. 2018Finding Influential Training Samples for Gradient Boosted Decision Treescited by 15
  7. 2021One Map Does Not Fit All: Evaluating Saliency Map Explanation on Multi-Modal Medical Imagescited by 11
  8. 2021A Multistakeholder Approach Towards Evaluating AI Transparency Mechanismscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.