Masked Self-Supervision for Remaining Useful Lifetime Prediction in Machine Tools
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prediction of Remaining Useful Lifetime(RUL) in the modern manufacturing and automation workplace for machines and tools is essential in Industry 4.0. This is clearly evident as continuous tool wear, or worse, sudden machine breakdown will lead to various manufacturing failures which would clearly cause economic loss. With the availability of deep learning approaches, the great potential and prospect of utilizing these for RUL prediction have resulted in several models which are designed driven by operation data of manufacturing machines. Current efforts in these which are based on fully-supervised models heavily rely on the data labeled with their RULs. However, the required RUL prediction data (i.e. the annotated and labeled data from faulty and/or degraded machines) can only be obtained after the machine breakdown occurs. The scarcity of broken machines in the modern manufacturing and automation workplace in real-world situations increases the difficulty of getting sufficient annotated and labeled data. In contrast, the data from healthy machines is much easier to be collected. Noting this challenge and the potential for improved effectiveness and applicability, we thus propose (and also fully develop) a method based on the idea of masked autoencoders which will utilize unlabeled data to do self-supervision. In thus the work here, a noteworthy masked self-supervised learning approach is developed and utilized. This is designed to seek to build a deep learning model for RUL prediction by utilizing unlabeled data. The experiments to verify the effectiveness of this development are implemented on the C-MAPSS datasets (which are collected from the data from the NASA turbofan engine). The results rather clearly show that our development and approach here perform better, in both accuracy and effectiveness, for RUL prediction when compared with approaches utilizing a fully-supervised model.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2022.
Builds on
7 of 19 references.
References · 7
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2019A Survey of Predictive Maintenance: Systems, Purposes and Approachescited by 21
- 2020Grasping Detection Network with Uncertainty Estimation for Confidence-Driven Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptationcited by 9
- 2021A stacked deep convolutional neural network to predict the remaining useful life of a turbofan enginecited by 7
- 2021Improving Semi-Supervised Learning for Remaining Useful Lifetime Estimation Through Self-Supervisioncited by 3
- 2022Incremental Few-Shot Learning via Implanting and Compressingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Few-Shot Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation via Contrastive Self-Supervision and Multi-Resolution Attentioncited by 8
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning for Data Scarcity in a Fatigue Damage Prognostic Problemcited by 3
- 2023Aerial Image Object Detection With Vision Transformer Detector (ViTDet)cited by 3
- 2024The State of Lithium-Ion Battery Health Prognostics in the CPS Eracited by 0
- 2024The State of Lithium-Ion Battery Health Prognostics in the CPS Era28 Mar 2024
- 2023Few-Shot Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation via Contrastive Self-Supervision and Multi-Resolution Attention21 Feb 2023
- 2023Aerial Image Object Detection With Vision Transformer Detector (ViTDet)28 Jan 2023
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning for Data Scarcity in a Fatigue Damage Prognostic Problem20 Jan 2023