mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

(Un)likelihood Training for Interpretable Embedding

arXiv 2207.00282 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2022cs.CV cs.IR cs.MMcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-modal representation learning has become a new normal for bridging the semantic gap between text and visual data. Learning modality agnostic representations in a continuous latent space, however, is often treated as a black-box data-driven training process. It is well-known that the effectiveness of representation learning depends heavily on the quality and scale of training data. For video representation learning, having a complete set of labels that annotate the full spectrum of video content for training is highly difficult if not impossible. These issues, black-box training and dataset bias, make representation learning practically challenging to be deployed for video understanding due to unexplainable and unpredictable results. In this paper, we propose two novel training objectives, likelihood and unlikelihood functions, to unroll semantics behind embeddings while addressing the label sparsity problem in training. The likelihood training aims to interpret semantics of embeddings beyond training labels, while the unlikelihood training leverages prior knowledge for regularization to ensure semantically coherent interpretation. With both training objectives, a new encoder-decoder network, which learns interpretable cross-modal representation, is proposed for ad-hoc video search. Extensive experiments on TRECVid and MSR-VTT datasets show the proposed network outperforms several state-of-the-art retrieval models with a statistically significant performance margin.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2022.

Builds on

23 of 71 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  6. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  7. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  8. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
  9. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  10. 2021CLIP4Clip: An Empirical Study of CLIP for End to End Video Clip Retrievalcited by 645
  11. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
  12. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
11 more
  1. 2019VATEX: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Multilingual Dataset for Video-and-Language Researchcited by 412
  2. 2018A Short Note about Kinetics-600cited by 331
  3. 2020Fine-grained Video-Text Retrieval with Hierarchical Graph Reasoningcited by 180
  4. 2016TGIF: A New Dataset and Benchmark on Animated GIF Descriptioncited by 124
  5. 2019Don't Say That! Making Inconsistent Dialogue Unlikely with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 110
  6. 2020Graph Structured Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 93
  7. 2018Dual Encoding for Zero-Example Video Retrievalcited by 85
  8. 2017Predicting Visual Features from Text for Image and Video Caption Retrievalcited by 53
  9. 2022Reading-strategy Inspired Visual Representation Learning for Text-to-Video Retrievalcited by 34
  10. 2020SEA: Sentence Encoder Assembly for Video Retrieval by Textual Queriescited by 26
  11. 2021Lightweight Attentional Feature Fusion: A New Baseline for Text-to-Video Retrievalcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.