mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Augment like there's no tomorrow: Consistently performing neural networks for medical imaging

arXiv 2206.15274 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks have achieved impressive performance in a wide variety of medical imaging tasks. However, these models often fail on data not used during training, such as data originating from a different medical centre. How to recognize models suffering from this fragility, and how to design robust models are the main obstacles to clinical adoption. Here, we present general methods to identify causes for model generalisation failures and how to circumvent them. First, we use textitdistribution-shifted datasets to show that models trained with current state-of-the-art methods are highly fragile to variability encountered in clinical practice, and then develop a textitstrong augmentation strategy to address this fragility. Distribution-shifted datasets allow us to discover this fragility, which can otherwise remain undetected after validation against multiple external datasets. Strong augmentation allows us to train robust models achieving consistent performance under shifts from the training data distribution. Importantly, we demonstrate that strong augmentation yields biomedical imaging models which retain high performance when applied to real-world clinical data. Our results pave the way for the development and evaluation of reliable and robust neural networks in clinical practice.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2022.

Builds on

23 of 55 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  6. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  7. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  8. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  9. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
  10. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
  11. 2018Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentationscited by 560
  12. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
11 more
  1. 2021ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
  2. 2020Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networkscited by 267
  3. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 227
  4. 2019Quantifying the effects of data augmentation and stain color normalization in convolutional neural networks for computational pathologycited by 173
  5. 2021Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling Strategiescited by 158
  6. 2018Whole-Slide Mitosis Detection in H&E Breast Histology Using PHH3 as a Reference to Train Distilled Stain-Invariant Convolutional Networkscited by 57
  7. 2020UniformAugment: A Search-free Probabilistic Data Augmentation Approachcited by 38
  8. 2018Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Improving Gleason Scoring of Prostate Cancercited by 34
  9. 2017Neural Stain-Style Transfer Learning using GAN for Histopathological Imagescited by 18
  10. 2019Whole-Slide Image Focus Quality: Automatic Assessment and Impact on AI Cancer Detectioncited by 12
  11. 2021Spectral decoupling allows training transferable neural networks in medical imagingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

5 papers.