mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dependency Parsing with Backtracking using Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2206.13914 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2022cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Greedy algorithms for NLP such as transition based parsing are prone to error propagation. One way to overcome this problem is to allow the algorithm to backtrack and explore an alternative solution in cases where new evidence contradicts the solution explored so far. In order to implement such a behavior, we use reinforcement learning and let the algorithm backtrack in cases where such an action gets a better reward than continuing to explore the current solution. We test this idea on both POS tagging and dependency parsing and show that backtracking is an effective means to fight against error propagation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2022.

Builds on

9 of 33 references.

References · 9

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  2. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
  3. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  4. 2015Transition-Based Dependency Parsing with Stack Long Short-Term Memorycited by 45
  5. 2019Rewarding Smatch: Transition-Based AMR Parsing with Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
  6. 2017AMR Parsing using Stack-LSTMscited by 15
  7. 2019Multi-Task Semantic Dependency Parsing with Policy Gradient for Learning Easy-First Strategiescited by 9
  8. 2016Training with Exploration Improves a Greedy Stack-LSTM Parsercited by 4
  9. 2017Tackling Error Propagation through Reinforcement Learning: A Case of Greedy Dependency Parsingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.