mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probing Causes of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translations

arXiv 2206.12529 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2022cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hallucination, one kind of pathological translations that bothers Neural Machine Translation, has recently drawn much attention. In simple terms, hallucinated translations are fluent sentences but barely related to source inputs. Arguably, it remains an open problem how hallucination occurs. In this paper, we propose to use probing methods to investigate the causes of hallucinations from the perspective of model architecture, aiming to avoid such problems in future architecture designs. By conducting experiments over various NMT datasets, we find that hallucination is often accompanied by the deficient encoder, especially embeddings, and vulnerable cross-attentions, while, interestingly, cross-attention mitigates some errors caused by the encoder.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2022.

Builds on

7 of 12 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  3. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 335
  4. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
  5. 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
  6. 2020Unsupervised Domain Clusters in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 160
  7. 2020On Exposure Bias, Hallucination and Domain Shift in Neural Machine Translationcited by 127

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

3 papers.