mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

zPROBE: Zero Peek Robustness Checks for Federated Learning

arXiv 2206.12100 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.CRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Privacy-preserving federated learning allows multiple users to jointly train a model with coordination of a central server. The server only learns the final aggregation result, thus the users' (private) training data is not leaked from the individual model updates. However, keeping the individual updates private allows malicious users to perform Byzantine attacks and degrade the accuracy without being detected. Best existing defenses against Byzantine workers rely on robust rank-based statistics, e.g., median, to find malicious updates. However, implementing privacy-preserving rank-based statistics is nontrivial and not scalable in the secure domain, as it requires sorting all individual updates. We establish the first private robustness check that uses high break point rank-based statistics on aggregated model updates. By exploiting randomized clustering, we significantly improve the scalability of our defense without compromising privacy. We leverage our statistical bounds in zero-knowledge proofs to detect and remove malicious updates without revealing the private user updates. Our novel framework, zPROBE, enables Byzantine resilient and secure federated learning. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that zPROBE provides a low overhead solution to defend against state-of-the-art Byzantine attacks while preserving privacy.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2022.

Builds on

25 of 54 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  5. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  6. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
  7. 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
  8. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
  9. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
  10. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
  11. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
  12. 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 317
13 more
  1. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
  2. 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
  3. 2020Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimizationcited by 137
  4. 2020Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketingcited by 128
  5. 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 118
  6. 2018Generalized Byzantine-tolerant SGDcited by 95
  7. 2020Byzantine-Resilient Secure Federated Learningcited by 93
  8. 2020Byzantine-Resilient Non-Convex Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 57
  9. 2020CryptoNAS: Private Inference on a ReLU Budgetcited by 40
  10. 2017Prio: Private, Robust, and Scalable Computation of Aggregate Statisticscited by 36
  11. 2021EIFFeL: Ensuring Integrity for Federated Learningcited by 28
  12. 2018Phocas: dimensional Byzantine-resilient stochastic gradient descentcited by 13
  13. 2021Secure Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning via Clusteringcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.