mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Right Tool for the Job: Open-Source Auditing Tools in Machine Learning

arXiv 2206.10613 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, discussions about fairness in machine learning, AI ethics and algorithm audits have increased. Many entities have developed framework guidance to establish a baseline rubric for fairness and accountability. However, in spite of increased discussions and multiple frameworks, algorithm and data auditing still remain difficult to execute in practice. Many open-source auditing tools are available, but users aren't always aware of the tools, what they are useful for, or how to access them. Model auditing and evaluation are not frequently emphasized skills in machine learning. There are also legal reasons for the proactive adoption of these tools that extend beyond the desire for greater fairness in machine learning. There are positive social issues of public perception and goodwill that matter in our highly connected global society. Greater awareness of these tools and the reasons for actively utilizing them may be helpful to the entire continuum of programmers, data scientists, engineers, researchers, users and consumers of AI and machine learning products. It is important for everyone to better understand the input and output differentials, how they are occurring, and what can be done to promote FATE (fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics) in machine- and deep learning. The ability to freely access open-source auditing tools removes barriers to fairness assessment at the most basic levels of machine learning. This paper aims to reinforce the urgent need to actually use these tools and provides motivations for doing so. The exemplary tools highlighted herein are open-source with software or code-base repositories available that can be used immediately by anyone worldwide.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2022.

Builds on

11 of 37 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  5. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  6. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  7. 2018Efficient GAN-Based Anomaly Detectioncited by 122
  8. 2019Exploring Interpretable LSTM Neural Networks over Multi-Variable Datacited by 42
  9. 2017Themis-ml: A Fairness-aware Machine Learning Interface for End-to-end Discrimination Discovery and Mitigationcited by 24
  10. 2019FairSearch: A Tool For Fairness in Ranked Search Resultscited by 22
  11. 2015Leveraging Deep Neural Networks and Knowledge Graphs for Entity Disambiguationcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.