mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Attention-driven Next-best-view Planning for Efficient Reconstruction of Plants and Targeted Plant Parts

arXiv 2206.10274 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2022cs.RO cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robots in tomato greenhouses need to perceive the plant and plant parts accurately to automate monitoring, harvesting, and de-leafing tasks. Existing perception systems struggle with the high levels of occlusion in plants and often result in poor perception accuracy. One reason for this is because they use fixed cameras or predefined camera movements. Next-best-view (NBV) planning presents an alternate approach, in which the camera viewpoints are reasoned and strategically planned such that the perception accuracy is improved. However, existing NBV-planning algorithms are agnostic to the task-at-hand and give equal importance to all the plant parts. This strategy is inefficient for greenhouse tasks that require targeted perception of specific plant parts, such as the perception of leaf nodes for de-leafing. To improve targeted perception in complex greenhouse environments, NBV planning algorithms need an attention mechanism to focus on the task-relevant plant parts. In this paper, the role of attention in improving targeted perception using an attention-driven NBV planning strategy was investigated. Through simulation experiments using plants with high levels of occlusion and structural complexity, it was shown that focusing attention on task-relevant plant parts can significantly improve the speed and accuracy of 3D reconstruction. Further, with real-world experiments, it was shown that these benefits extend to complex greenhouse conditions with natural variation and occlusion, natural illumination, sensor noise, and uncertainty in camera poses. The results clearly indicate that using attention-driven NBV planning in greenhouses can significantly improve the efficiency of perception and enhance the performance of robotic systems in greenhouse crop production.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2022.

Builds on

4 of 34 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Next-Best View Policy for 3D Reconstructioncited by 35
  2. 2019Supervised Learning of the Next-Best-View for 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 24
  3. 2016A Reinforcement Learning Approach to the View Planning Problemcited by 10
  4. 2020Viewpoint Planning for Fruit Size and Position Estimationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

10 papers.