mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analysis of Augmentations for Contrastive ECG Representation Learning

arXiv 2206.07656 ↗First posted 30 May 2022eess.SP cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper systematically investigates the effectiveness of various augmentations for contrastive self-supervised learning of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals and identifies the best parameters. The baseline of our proposed self-supervised framework consists of two main parts: the contrastive learning and the downstream task. In the first stage, we train an encoder using a number of augmentations to extract generalizable ECG signal representations. We then freeze the encoder and finetune a few linear layers with different amounts of labelled data for downstream arrhythmia detection. We then experiment with various augmentations techniques and explore a range of parameters. Our experiments are done on PTB-XL, a large and publicly available 12-lead ECG dataset. The results show that applying augmentations in a specific range of complexities works better for self-supervised contrastive learning. For instance, when adding Gaussian noise, a sigma in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 achieves better results, while poor training occurs when the added noise is too small or too large (outside of the specified range). A similar trend is observed with other augmentations, demonstrating the importance of selecting the optimum level of difficulty for the added augmentations, as augmentations that are too simple will not result in effective training, while augmentations that are too difficult will also prevent the model from effective learning of generalized representations. Our work can influence future research on self-supervised contrastive learning on bio-signals and aid in selecting optimum parameters for different augmentations.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2022.

Builds on

21 of 57 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  5. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  6. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  7. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
  8. 2016Colorful Image Colorizationcited by 1,113
  9. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
  10. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  11. 2021Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrastingcited by 342
  12. 2020CLOCS: Contrastive Learning of Cardiac Signals Across Space, Time, and Patientscited by 170
9 more
  1. 2021Contrastive Learning with Stronger Augmentationscited by 100
  2. 2020Self-supervised ECG Representation Learning for Emotion Recognitioncited by 99
  3. 2018ECG Heartbeat Classification: A Deep Transferable Representationcited by 76
  4. 2020Subject-Aware Contrastive Learning for Biosignalscited by 75
  5. 2017Transitive Invariance for Self-supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 37
  6. 20213KG: Contrastive Learning of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms using Physiologically-Inspired Augmentationscited by 36
  7. 2019Self-supervised Learning for ECG-based Emotion Recognitioncited by 32
  8. 2018ECG arrhythmia classification using a 2-D convolutional neural networkcited by 17
  9. 2020Detection of Maternal and Fetal Stress from the Electrocardiogram with Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

12 papers.