mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning the Structure of Large Networked Systems Obeying Conservation Laws

arXiv 2206.07083 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2022stat.ML cs.LG eess.SPcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many networked systems such as electric networks, the brain, and social networks of opinion dynamics are known to obey conservation laws. Examples of this phenomenon include the Kirchoff laws in electric networks and opinion consensus in social networks. Conservation laws in networked systems may be modeled as balance equations of the form X = B* Y, where the sparsity pattern of B* captures the connectivity of the network, and Y, X ∈ ℝp are vectors of "potentials" and "injected flows" at the nodes respectively. The node potentials Y cause flows across edges and the flows X injected at the nodes are extraneous to the network dynamics. In several practical systems, the network structure is often unknown and needs to be estimated from data. Towards this, one has access to samples of the node potentials Y, but only the statistics of the node injections X. Motivated by this important problem, we study the estimation of the sparsity structure of the matrix B* from n samples of Y under the assumption that the node injections X follow a Gaussian distribution with a known covariance SigmaX. We propose a new ℓ1-regularized maximum likelihood estimator for this problem in the high-dimensional regime where the size of the network p is larger than sample size n. We show that this optimization problem is convex in the objective and admits a unique solution. Under a new mutual incoherence condition, we establish sufficient conditions on the triple (n,p,d) for which exact sparsity recovery of B* is possible with high probability; d is the degree of the graph. We also establish guarantees for the recovery of B* in the element-wise maximum, Frobenius, and operator norms. Finally, we complement these theoretical results with experimental validation of the performance of the proposed estimator on synthetic and real-world data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2022.

Builds on

17 of 78 references.

References · 17

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2018Connecting the Dots: Identifying Network Structure via Graph Signal Processingcited by 111
  3. 2016Stationary Graph Processes and Spectral Estimationcited by 35
  4. 2014Support recovery without incoherence: A case for nonconvex regularizationcited by 25
  5. 2013Exact and Stable Covariance Estimation from Quadratic Sampling via Convex Programmingcited by 20
  6. 2013ROP: Matrix recovery via rank-one projectionscited by 18
  7. 2016The Gaussian Graphical Model in Cross-sectional and Time-series Datacited by 9
  8. 2016Active Learning Algorithms for Graphical Model Selectioncited by 7
  9. 2018Physics Informed Topology Learning in Networks of Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 7
  10. 2019Graphical Models in Meshed Distribution Grids: Topology estimation, change detection and limitationscited by 5
  11. 2019Thresholding Graph Bandits with GrAPLcited by 5
  12. 2015Modeling of Physical Network Systemscited by 2
5 more
  1. 2018Convex Formulation for Regularized Estimation of Structural Equation Modelscited by 2
  2. 2021Graph Community Detection from Coarse Measurements: Recovery Conditions for the Coarsened Weighted Stochastic Block Modelcited by 2
  3. 2015Extreme Compressive Sampling for Covariance Estimationcited by 1
  4. 2019Learning Graphs from Linear Measurements: Fundamental Trade-offs and Applicationscited by 1
  5. 2020Sparse Cholesky covariance parametrization for recovering latent structure in ordered datacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.