A Theoretical Understanding of Neural Network Compression from Sparse Linear Approximation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The goal of model compression is to reduce the size of a large neural network while retaining a comparable performance. As a result, computation and memory costs in resource-limited applications may be significantly reduced by dropping redundant weights, neurons, or layers. There have been many model compression algorithms proposed that provide impressive empirical success. However, a theoretical understanding of model compression is still limited. One problem is understanding if a network is more compressible than another of the same structure. Another problem is quantifying how much one can prune a network with theoretically guaranteed accuracy degradation. In this work, we propose to use the sparsity-sensitive ℓq-norm (0<q<1) to characterize compressibility and provide a relationship between soft sparsity of the weights in the network and the degree of compression with a controlled accuracy degradation bound. We also develop adaptive algorithms for pruning each neuron in the network informed by our theory. Numerical studies demonstrate the promising performance of the proposed methods compared with standard pruning algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2022.
Builds on
18 of 30 references.
References · 18
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
- 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 702
- 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 527
- 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 442
- 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 307
- 2016Network Trimming: A Data-Driven Neuron Pruning Approach towards Efficient Deep Architecturescited by 221
6 more
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 201
- 2020Logarithmic Pruning is All You Needcited by 71
- 2020Good Subnetworks Provably Exist: Pruning via Greedy Forward Selectioncited by 70
- 2018Data-Dependent Coresets for Compressing Neural Networks with Applications to Generalization Boundscited by 43
- 2019Data-Independent Neural Pruning via Coresetscited by 35
- 2021Why Lottery Ticket Wins? A Theoretical Perspective of Sample Complexity on Pruned Neural Networkscited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Pruning Deep Neural Networks from a Sparsity Perspectivecited by 25
- 2025Probe Pruning: Accelerating LLMs through Dynamic Pruning via Model-Probingcited by 14
- 2023Provable Identifiability of Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks via LASSO Regularizationcited by 4
- 2025Leveraging KV Similarity for Online Structured Pruning in LLMscited by 0
- 2026Width-Independent Compressibility of Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Width-Independent Compressibility of Deep Neural Networks22 Aug 2026
- 2025Leveraging KV Similarity for Online Structured Pruning in LLMs8 Dec 2025
- 2025Probe Pruning: Accelerating LLMs through Dynamic Pruning via Model-Probing21 Feb 2025
- 2023Provable Identifiability of Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks via LASSO Regularization7 May 2023
- 2023Pruning Deep Neural Networks from a Sparsity Perspective11 Feb 2023