mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lost in Transmission: On the Impact of Networking Corruptions on Video Machine Learning Models

arXiv 2206.05252 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study how networking corruptions--data corruptions caused by networking errors--affect video machine learning (ML) models. We discover apparent networking corruptions in Kinetics-400, a benchmark video ML dataset. In a simulation study, we investigate (1) what artifacts networking corruptions cause, (2) how such artifacts affect ML models, and (3) whether standard robustness methods can mitigate their negative effects. We find that networking corruptions cause visual and temporal artifacts (i.e., smeared colors or frame drops). These networking corruptions degrade performance on a variety of video ML tasks, but effects vary by task and dataset, depending on how much temporal context the tasks require. Lastly, we evaluate data augmentation--a standard defense for data corruptions--but find that it does not recover performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2022.

Builds on

25 of 48 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  2. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  3. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  5. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
  6. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
  7. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  8. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  9. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  10. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  11. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
  12. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,103
13 more
  1. 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 957
  2. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
  3. 2018TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 856
  4. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  5. 2017Can Spatiotemporal 3D CNNs Retrace the History of 2D CNNs and ImageNet?cited by 551
  6. 2019Video Object Segmentation using Space-Time Memory Networkscited by 438
  7. 2019Video Classification with Channel-Separated Convolutional Networkscited by 290
  8. 2020UniVL: A Unified Video and Language Pre-Training Model for Multimodal Understanding and Generationcited by 259
  9. 2020Probabilistic Regression for Visual Trackingcited by 231
  10. 2019SiamFC++: Towards Robust and Accurate Visual Tracking with Target Estimation Guidelinescited by 177
  11. 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 119
  12. 2020Know Your Surroundings: Exploiting Scene Information for Object Trackingcited by 119
  13. 2020A Transductive Approach for Video Object Segmentationcited by 55

Built on by

Not cited yet.