mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BSM loss: A superior way in modeling aleatory uncertainty of fine_grained classification

arXiv 2206.04479 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence(AI)-assisted method had received much attention in the risk field such as disease diagnosis. Different from the classification of disease types, it is a fine-grained task to classify the medical images as benign or malignant. However, most research only focuses on improving the diagnostic accuracy and ignores the evaluation of model reliability, which limits its clinical application. For clinical practice, calibration presents major challenges in the low-data regime extremely for over-parametrized models and inherent noises. In particular, we discovered that modeling data-dependent uncertainty is more conducive to confidence calibrations. Compared with test-time augmentation(TTA), we proposed a modified Bootstrapping loss(BS loss) function with Mixup data augmentation strategy that can better calibrate predictive uncertainty and capture data distribution transformation without additional inference time. Our experiments indicated that BS loss with Mixup(BSM) model can halve the Expected Calibration Error(ECE) compared to standard data augmentation, deep ensemble and MC dropout. The correlation between uncertainty and similarity of in-domain data is up to -0.4428 under the BSM model. Additionally, the BSM model is able to perceive the semantic distance of out-of-domain data, demonstrating high potential in real-world clinical practice.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2022.

Builds on

18 of 32 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  5. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  6. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  7. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  8. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
  9. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  10. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  11. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  12. 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 278
6 more
  1. 2020Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensemblescited by 138
  2. 2021Semi-supervised Left Atrium Segmentation with Mutual Consistency Trainingcited by 104
  3. 2020Deep Mining External Imperfect Data for Chest X-ray Disease Screeningcited by 27
  4. 2021Dual-Consistency Semi-Supervised Learning with Uncertainty Quantification for COVID-19 Lesion Segmentation from CT Imagescited by 22
  5. 2020Joint Left Atrial Segmentation and Scar Quantification Based on a DNN with Spatial Encoding and Shape Attentioncited by 15
  6. 2020Learning to Segment Anatomical Structures Accurately from One Exemplarcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.