Chordal Sparsity for SDP-based Neural Network Verification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks are central to many emerging technologies, but verifying their correctness remains a major challenge. It is known that network outputs can be sensitive and fragile to even small input perturbations, thereby increasing the risk of unpredictable and undesirable behavior. Fast and accurate verification of neural networks is therefore critical to their widespread adoption, and in recent years, various methods have been developed as a response to this problem. In this paper, we focus on improving semidefinite programming (SDP) based techniques for neural network verification. Such techniques offer the power of expressing complex geometric constraints while retaining a convex problem formulation, but scalability remains a major issue in practice. Our starting point is the DeepSDP framework proposed by Fazlyab et al., which uses quadratic constraints to abstract the verification problem into a large-scale SDP. However, solving this SDP quickly becomes intractable when the network grows. Our key observation is that by leveraging chordal sparsity, we can decompose the primary computational bottleneck of DeepSDP -- a large linear matrix inequality (LMI) -- into an equivalent collection of smaller LMIs. We call our chordally sparse optimization program Chordal-DeepSDP and prove that its construction is identically expressive as that of DeepSDP. Moreover, we show that additional analysis of Chordal-DeepSDP allows us to further rewrite its collection of LMIs in a second level of decomposition that we call Chordal-DeepSDP-2 -- which results in another significant computational gain. Finally, we provide numerical experiments on real networks of learned cart-pole dynamics, showcasing the computational advantage of Chordal-DeepSDP and Chordal-DeepSDP-2 over DeepSDP.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2022.
Builds on
27 of 50 references.
References · 27
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
- 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
- 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
- 2018Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examplescited by 179
- 2020NNV: The Neural Network Verification Tool for Deep Neural Networks and Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 128
- 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 127
- 2017Learning Deep Neural Network Representations for Koopman Operators of Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 127
- 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
- 2019Safety Verification and Robustness Analysis of Neural Networks via Quadratic Constraints and Semidefinite Programmingcited by 101
15 more
- 2020Training robust neural networks using Lipschitz boundscited by 99
- 2018Verisig: verifying safety properties of hybrid systems with neural network controllerscited by 84
- 2017Output Reachable Set Estimation and Verification for Multi-Layer Neural Networkscited by 80
- 2021PRIMA: General and Precise Neural Network Certification via Scalable Convex Hull Approximationscited by 77
- 2021The Second International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2021): Summary and Resultscited by 71
- 2015JuMP: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Optimizationcited by 49
- 2020Reachable Polyhedral Marching (RPM): A Safety Verification Algorithm for Robotic Systems with Deep Neural Network Componentscited by 36
- 2022Chordal Sparsity for Lipschitz Constant Estimation of Deep Neural Networkscited by 15
- 2021Neural Network Verification in Controlcited by 14
- 2022A Unified View of SDP-based Neural Network Verification through Completely Positive Programmingcited by 12
- 2021DeepSplit: Scalable Verification of Deep Neural Networks via Operator Splittingcited by 8
- 2022Sparse Polynomial Optimisation for Neural Network Verificationcited by 8
- 2021Verifying Quantized Neural Networks using SMT-Based Model Checkingcited by 6
- 2021QNNVerifier: A Tool for Verifying Neural Networks using SMT-Based Model Checkingcited by 4
- 2020Chordal Decomposition for Spectral Coarseningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Verifying Properties of Binary Neural Networks Using Sparse Polynomial Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025A Scalable Approach for Safe and Robust Learning via Lipschitz-Constrained Networkscited by 0
- 2026Convex training of Lipschitz-regularized shallow neural networkscited by 0
- 2026Scalable Incremental Robustness Analysis of Neural Network Feedback Systemscited by 0
- 2026Scalable Incremental Robustness Analysis of Neural Network Feedback Systems18 Sep 2026
- 2026Convex training of Lipschitz-regularized shallow neural networks17 Jun 2026
- 2025A Scalable Approach for Safe and Robust Learning via Lipschitz-Constrained Networks30 Jun 2025
- 2024Verifying Properties of Binary Neural Networks Using Sparse Polynomial Optimization27 May 2024