mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Unified View of SDP-based Neural Network Verification through Completely Positive Programming

arXiv 2203.03034 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2022math.OC cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Verifying that input-output relationships of a neural network conform to prescribed operational specifications is a key enabler towards deploying these networks in safety-critical applications. Semidefinite programming (SDP)-based approaches to Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) network verification transcribe this problem into an optimization problem, where the accuracy of any such formulation reflects the level of fidelity in how the neural network computation is represented, as well as the relaxations of intractable constraints. While the literature contains much progress on improving the tightness of SDP formulations while maintaining tractability, comparatively little work has been devoted to the other extreme, i.e., how to most accurately capture the original verification problem before SDP relaxation. In this work, we develop an exact, convex formulation of verification as a completely positive program (CPP), and provide analysis showing that our formulation is minimal -- the removal of any constraint fundamentally misrepresents the neural network computation. We leverage our formulation to provide a unifying view of existing approaches, and give insight into the source of large relaxation gaps observed in some cases.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2022.

Builds on

20 of 36 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  2. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
  3. 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 241
  4. 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  5. 2018Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervalscited by 185
  6. 2018Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examplescited by 178
  7. 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
  8. 2018Scaling provable adversarial defensescited by 141
  9. 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 126
  10. 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
  11. 2019A Convex Relaxation Barrier to Tight Robustness Verification of Neural Networkscited by 124
  12. 2019Safety Verification and Robustness Analysis of Neural Networks via Quadratic Constraints and Semidefinite Programmingcited by 100
8 more
  1. 2017Maximum Resilience of Artificial Neural Networkscited by 97
  2. 2020Enabling certification of verification-agnostic networks via memory-efficient semidefinite programmingcited by 65
  3. 2018Training verified learners with learned verifierscited by 50
  4. 2021Improved Branch and Bound for Neural Network Verification via Lagrangian Decompositioncited by 44
  5. 2017Deep Neural Networks as 0-1 Mixed Integer Linear Programs: A Feasibility Studycited by 25
  6. 2017DSOS and SDSOS Optimization: More Tractable Alternatives to Sum of Squares and Semidefinite Optimizationcited by 19
  7. 2020On the Tightness of Semidefinite Relaxations for Certifying Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 14
  8. 2021Neural Network Branch-and-Bound for Neural Network Verificationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

12 papers.