mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning for Detection of 3D Features using sparse X-ray data

arXiv 2206.02564 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2022cs.CV eess.IV physics.data-ancited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many inertial confinement fusion experiments, the neutron yield and other parameters cannot be completely accounted for with one and two dimensional models. This discrepancy suggests that there are three dimensional effects which may be significant. Sources of these effects include defects in the shells and shell interfaces, the fill tube of the capsule, and the joint feature in double shell targets. Due to their ability to penetrate materials, X-rays are used to capture the internal structure of objects. Methods such as Computational Tomography use X-ray radiographs from hundreds of projections in order to reconstruct a three dimensional model of the object. In experimental environments, such as the National Ignition Facility and Omega-60, the availability of these views is scarce and in many cases only consist of a single line of sight. Mathematical reconstruction of a 3D object from sparse views is an ill-posed inverse problem. These types of problems are typically solved by utilizing prior information. Neural networks have been used for the task of 3D reconstruction as they are capable of encoding and leveraging this prior information. We utilize half a dozen different convolutional neural networks to produce different 3D representations of ICF implosions from the experimental data. We utilize deep supervision to train a neural network to produce high resolution reconstructions. We use these representations to track 3D features of the capsules such as the ablator, inner shell, and the joint between shell hemispheres. Machine learning, supplemented by different priors, is a promising method for 3D reconstructions in ICF and X-ray radiography in general.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2022.

Builds on

10 of 27 references.

References · 10

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  2. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  3. 20163D-R2N2: A Unified Approach for Single and Multi-view 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 587
  4. 2019Image-based 3D Object Reconstruction: State-of-the-Art and Trends in the Deep Learning Eracited by 87
  5. 2018Robust Attentional Aggregation of Deep Feature Sets for Multi-view 3D Reconstructioncited by 44
  6. 2019TraVeLGAN: Image-to-image Translation by Transformation Vector Learningcited by 35
  7. 2019Transformable Bottleneck Networkscited by 23
  8. 2018Multi-View Silhouette and Depth Decomposition for High Resolution 3D Object Representationcited by 7
  9. 2017Deep learning for plasma tomography using the bolometer system at JETcited by 2
  10. 2018Full-pulse Tomographic Reconstruction with Deep Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.