A Control Theoretic Framework for Adaptive Gradient Optimizers in Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adaptive gradient methods have become popular in optimizing deep neural networks; recent examples include AdaGrad and Adam. Although Adam usually converges faster, variations of Adam, for instance, the AdaBelief algorithm, have been proposed to enhance Adam's poor generalization ability compared to the classical stochastic gradient method. This paper develops a generic framework for adaptive gradient methods that solve non-convex optimization problems. We first model the adaptive gradient methods in a state-space framework, which allows us to present simpler convergence proofs of adaptive optimizers such as AdaGrad, Adam, and AdaBelief. We then utilize the transfer function paradigm from classical control theory to propose a new variant of Adam, coined AdamSSM. We add an appropriate pole-zero pair in the transfer function from squared gradients to the second moment estimate. We prove the convergence of the proposed AdamSSM algorithm. Applications on benchmark machine learning tasks of image classification using CNN architectures and language modeling using LSTM architecture demonstrate that the AdamSSM algorithm improves the gap between generalization accuracy and faster convergence than the recent adaptive gradient methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2022.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 841
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 772
- 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 283
- 2015A Differential Equation for Modeling Nesterov's Accelerated Gradient Method: Theory and Insightscited by 206
- 2019Adaptive Gradient Methods with Dynamic Bound of Learning Ratecited by 183
- 2018On the Convergence of A Class of Adam-Type Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 174
- 2020A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagradcited by 171
12 more
- 2018On the Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Adaptive Stepsizescited by 156
- 2017Dissecting Adam: The Sign, Magnitude and Variance of Stochastic Gradientscited by 139
- 2016A Variational Perspective on Accelerated Methods in Optimizationcited by 110
- 2018Understanding the Acceleration Phenomenon via High-Resolution Differential Equationscited by 69
- 2018Convergence and Dynamical Behavior of the ADAM Algorithm for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 49
- 2020On the distance between two neural networks and the stability of learningcited by 46
- 2018Convergence guarantees for RMSProp and ADAM in non-convex optimization and an empirical comparison to Nesterov accelerationcited by 39
- 2018Learning Personalized End-to-End Goal-Oriented Dialogcited by 19
- 2019Gradient flows and proximal splitting methods: A unified view on accelerated and stochastic optimizationcited by 9
- 2020Resource-Aware Discretization of Accelerated Optimization Flowscited by 2
- 2021Transient growth of accelerated optimization algorithmscited by 2
- 2021Generalized AdaGrad (G-AdaGrad) and Adam: A State-Space Perspectivecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.