Indirect Active Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional models of active learning assume a learner can directly manipulate or query a covariate X in order to study its relationship with a response Y. However, if X is a feature of a complex system, it may be possible only to indirectly influence X by manipulating a control variable Z, a scenario we refer to as Indirect Active Learning. Under a nonparametric model of Indirect Active Learning with a fixed budget, we study minimax convergence rates for estimating the relationship between X and Y locally at a point, obtaining different rates depending on the complexities and noise levels of the relationships between Z and X and between X and Y. We also identify minimax rates for passive learning under comparable assumptions. In many cases, our results show that, while there is an asymptotic benefit to active learning, this benefit is fully realized by a simple two-stage learner that runs two passive experiments in sequence.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2022.
Builds on
8 of 60 references.
References · 8
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
- 2019Kernel Instrumental Variable Regressioncited by 118
- 2017Generative Adversarial Active Learningcited by 69
- 2014Rates of Convergence for Nearest Neighbor Classificationcited by 45
- 2020Interpretable Sequence Learning for COVID-19 Forecastingcited by 22
- 2016Finite-Sample Analysis of Fixed-k Nearest Neighbor Density Functional Estimatorscited by 8
- 2021MEAL: Manifold Embedding-based Active Learningcited by 5
- 2015An Analysis of Active Learning With Uniform Feature Noisecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.