mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prefix Conditioning Unifies Language and Label Supervision

arXiv 2206.01125 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2022cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image-classification datasets have been used to pretrain image recognition models. Recently, web-scale image-caption datasets have emerged as a source of powerful pretraining alternative. Image-caption datasets are more ``open-domain'', containing a wider variety of scene types and vocabulary words than traditional classification datasets, and models trained on these datasets have demonstrated strong performance on few- and zero-shot recognition tasks. When naively unifying image-classification and -caption dataset, we show that such dataset biases negatively affect pre-training by reducing the generalizability of learned representations and thus jeopardizing zero-shot performance since the unification can tailor the model for the classification dataset, making it vulnerable to the distribution shift from the dataset. In this work, we address the problem by disentangling the dataset bias using prefix tokens that inform a language encoder of the type of the input dataset (e.g., image-classification or caption) at training time. This approach allows the language encoder to share the knowledge from two datasets as well as switch the mode of feature extraction, i.e., image-classification dataset or image-caption dataset tailored mode, where we use image-caption mode in the zero-shot evaluation. Our method is generic and can be easily integrated into existing VL pre-training objectives such as CLIP or UniCL. In experiments, we show that this simple technique improves the performance in zero-shot image recognition accuracy and robustness to the image-level distribution shift.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2022.

Builds on

44 of 60 references.

References · 44

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  7. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  8. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  9. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  10. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  11. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  12. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
32 more
  1. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  2. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
  3. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  4. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  5. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  6. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  7. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  8. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
  9. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  10. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  11. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
  12. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,216
  13. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  14. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  15. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  16. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 627
  17. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 436
  18. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  19. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 377
  20. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- The Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 255
  21. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  22. 2022Vision-Language Pre-Training with Triple Contrastive Learningcited by 212
  23. 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
  24. 2022Unified Contrastive Learning in Image-Text-Label Spacecited by 194
  25. 2014Evaluation of Output Embeddings for Fine-Grained Image Classificationcited by 166
  26. 2018Zero-shot Recognition via Semantic Embeddings and Knowledge Graphscited by 155
  27. 2016Latent Embeddings for Zero-shot Classificationcited by 129
  28. 2021Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labelscited by 118
  29. 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
  30. 2022K-LITE: Learning Transferable Visual Models with External Knowledgecited by 79
  31. 2021Adaptive Methods for Real-World Domain Generalizationcited by 66
  32. 2014Zero Shot Recognition with Unreliable Attributescited by 39

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 7; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: