Differentially Private Shapley Values for Data Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Shapley value has been proposed as a solution to many applications in machine learning, including for equitable valuation of data. Shapley values are computationally expensive and involve the entire dataset. The query for a point's Shapley value can also compromise the statistical privacy of other data points. We observe that in machine learning problems such as empirical risk minimization, and in many learning algorithms (such as those with uniform stability), a diminishing returns property holds, where marginal benefit per data point decreases rapidly with data sample size. Based on this property, we propose a new stratified approximation method called the Layered Shapley Algorithm. We prove that this method operates on small (O(polylog(n))) random samples of data and small sized (O(log n)) coalitions to achieve the results with guaranteed probabilistic accuracy, and can be modified to incorporate differential privacy. Experimental results show that the algorithm correctly identifies high-value data points that improve validation accuracy, and that the differentially private evaluations preserve approximate ranking of data.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.
Builds on
31 of 56 references.
References · 31
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 919
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
- 2019A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protectioncited by 374
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 281
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
19 more
- 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
- 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 154
- 2019Efficient Task-Specific Data Valuation for Nearest Neighbor Algorithmscited by 148
- 2019Data Valuation using Reinforcement Learningcited by 116
- 2020Neuron Shapley: Discovering the Responsible Neuronscited by 98
- 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 98
- 2020A Distributional Framework for Data Valuationcited by 80
- 2021GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 74
- 2020Efficient nonparametric statistical inference on population feature importance using Shapley valuescited by 61
- 2013Bounding the Estimation Error of Sampling-based Shapley Value Approximationcited by 58
- 2018Generalization Bounds for Uniformly Stable Algorithmscited by 56
- 2021Shapley values for feature selection: The good, the bad, and the axiomscited by 54
- 2021Robin Hood and Matthew Effects: Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Synthetic Datacited by 48
- 2020Efficient computation and analysis of distributional Shapley valuescited by 38
- 2021The Shapley Value of Classifiers in Ensemble Gamescited by 23
- 2018Finding Influential Training Samples for Gradient Boosted Decision Treescited by 15
- 2019Scalability vs. Utility: Do We Have to Sacrifice One for the Other in Data Importance Quantification?cited by 9
- 2015Influence in Classification via Cooperative Game Theorycited by 7
- 2013Stability of Multi-Task Kernel Regression Algorithmscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2023Threshold KNN-Shapley: A Linear-Time and Privacy-Friendly Approach to Data Valuationcited by 19
- 2024Incentives in Private Collaborative Machine Learningcited by 10
- 2024A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasurescited by 6
- 2024A Comprehensive Study of Shapley Value in Data Analyticscited by 2
- 2025Detect & Score: Privacy-Preserving Misbehaviour Detection and Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2025On the Fragility of Contribution Score Computation in Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2026Private and Robust Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2026Challenges in Enabling Private Data Valuationcited by 1
- 2026Challenges in Enabling Private Data Valuation27 Feb 2026
- 2026Private and Robust Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning25 Feb 2026
- 2025On the Fragility of Contribution Score Computation in Federated Learning24 Sep 2025
- 2025Detect & Score: Privacy-Preserving Misbehaviour Detection and Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning30 Jun 2025
- 2024A Comprehensive Study of Shapley Value in Data Analytics2 Dec 2024
- 2024Incentives in Private Collaborative Machine Learning2 Apr 2024
- 2024A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasures31 Mar 2024
- 2023Threshold KNN-Shapley: A Linear-Time and Privacy-Friendly Approach to Data Valuation30 Aug 2023