Fair Comparison between Efficient Attentions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformers have been successfully used in various fields and are becoming the standard tools in computer vision. However, self-attention, a core component of transformers, has a quadratic complexity problem, which limits the use of transformers in various vision tasks that require dense prediction. Many studies aiming at solving this problem have been reported proposed. However, no comparative study of these methods using the same scale has been reported due to different model configurations, training schemes, and new methods. In our paper, we validate these efficient attention models on the ImageNet1K classification task by changing only the attention operation and examining which efficient attention is better.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.
Builds on
13 of 16 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,293
- 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
- 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,684
- 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,601
- 2020Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexitycited by 1,474
- 2020Efficient Transformers: A Surveycited by 790
- 2018Efficient Attention: Attention with Linear Complexitiescited by 368
- 2021XCiT: Cross-Covariance Image Transformerscited by 338
1 more
- 2021Fastformer: Additive Attention Can Be All You Needcited by 61
Built on by
Not cited yet.