mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Negative Sampling for Contrastive Representation Learning: A Review

arXiv 2206.00212 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2022cs.IRcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The learn-to-compare paradigm of contrastive representation learning (CRL), which compares positive samples with negative ones for representation learning, has achieved great success in a wide range of domains, including natural language processing, computer vision, information retrieval and graph learning. While many research works focus on data augmentations, nonlinear transformations or other certain parts of CRL, the importance of negative sample selection is usually overlooked in literature. In this paper, we provide a systematic review of negative sampling (NS) techniques and discuss how they contribute to the success of CRL. As the core part of this paper, we summarize the existing NS methods into four categories with pros and cons in each genre, and further conclude with several open research questions as future directions. By generalizing and aligning the fundamental NS ideas across multiple domains, we hope this survey can accelerate cross-domain knowledge sharing and motivate future researches for better CRL.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 7; 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023TimesURL: Self-supervised Contrastive Learning for Universal Time Series Representation Learningcited by 51
  2. 2024Boosting Masked ECG-Text Auto-Encoders as Discriminative Learnerscited by 16
  3. 2024Negating Negatives: Alignment with Human Negative Samples via Distributional Dispreference Optimizationcited by 11
  4. 2024Neighborhood-Enhanced Supervised Contrastive Learning for Collaborative Filteringcited by 10
  5. 2023ChatGPT-Like Large-Scale Foundation Models for Prognostics and Health Management: A Survey and Roadmapscited by 8
  6. 2023Improving Contextualized Topic Models with Negative Samplingcited by 4
  7. 2024From Overfitting to Robustness: Quantity, Quality, and Variety Oriented Negative Sample Selection in Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 4
  8. 2026Taxonomy of the Retrieval System Framework: Pitfalls and Paradigmscited by 4
  9. 2023Bayesian Self-Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 3
  10. 2025Revealing Multimodal Causality with Large Language Modelscited by 3
  11. 2025Graph Your Own Promptcited by 2
  12. 2026Contrastive Learning with Narrative Twins for Modeling Story Saliencecited by 2
11 more
  1. 2023Topology-aware Debiased Self-supervised Graph Learning for Recommendationcited by 1
  2. 2024Paying Attention to Deflections: Mining Pragmatic Nuances for Whataboutism Detection in Online Discoursecited by 1
  3. 2024Stimulate the Potential of Robots via Competitioncited by 1
  4. 2026Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning in RAG Systems: A Comparison of LLM-Based Retriever Evaluation Strategiescited by 1
  5. 2024An Energy-based Model for Word-level AutoCompletion in Computer-aided Translationcited by 0
  6. 2025Evaluating Negative Sampling Approaches for Neural Topic Modelscited by 0
  7. 2025Advancing Wildfire Risk Prediction via Morphology-Aware Curriculum Contrastive Learningcited by 0
  8. 2025Causal Negative Sampling via Diffusion Model for Out-of-Distribution Recommendationcited by 0
  9. 2025Osmotic Learning: A Self-Supervised Paradigm for Decentralized Contextual Data Representationcited by 0
  10. 2026LEMON: a foundation model for nuclear morphology in Computational Pathologycited by 0
  11. 2026MiqraBERT: Regression-Based Sentence-BERT Finetuning for Biblical Hebrew Parallel Detectioncited by 0