Bias-inducing geometries: an exactly solvable data model with fairness implications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) may be oblivious to human bias but it is not immune to its perpetuation. Marginalisation and iniquitous group representation are often traceable in the very data used for training, and may be reflected or even enhanced by the learning models. In the present work, we aim at clarifying the role played by data geometry in the emergence of ML bias. We introduce an exactly solvable high-dimensional model of data imbalance, where parametric control over the many bias-inducing factors allows for an extensive exploration of the bias inheritance mechanism. Through the tools of statistical physics, we analytically characterise the typical properties of learning models trained in this synthetic framework and obtain exact predictions for the observables that are commonly employed for fairness assessment. Despite the simplicity of the data model, we retrace and unpack typical unfairness behaviour observed on real-world datasets. We also obtain a detailed analytical characterisation of a class of bias mitigation strategies. We first consider a basic loss-reweighing scheme, which allows for an implicit minimisation of different unfairness metrics, and quantify the incompatibilities between some existing fairness criteria. Then, we consider a novel mitigation strategy based on a matched inference approach, consisting in the introduction of coupled learning models. Our theoretical analysis of this approach shows that the coupled strategy can strike superior fairness-accuracy trade-offs.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2022.
Builds on
27 of 66 references.
References · 27
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
15 more
- 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 193
- 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 178
- 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
- 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
- 2015Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithmscited by 128
- 2021Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student modelcited by 126
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
- 2020The role of regularization in classification of high-dimensional noisy Gaussian mixturecited by 63
- 2016A statistical framework for fair predictive algorithmscited by 38
- 2019Fair Data Adaptation with Quantile Preservationcited by 30
- 2021An Analytical Theory of Curriculum Learning in Teacher-Student Networkscited by 27
- 2021Probing transfer learning with a model of synthetic correlated datasetscited by 25
- 2022Learning curves for the multi-class teacher-student perceptroncited by 17
- 2020Solvable Model for Inheriting the Regularization through Knowledge Distillationcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024Optimal Protocols for Continual Learning via Statistical Physics and Control Theorycited by 14
- 2024Tilting the Odds at the Lottery: the Interplay of Overparameterisation and Curricula in Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2024Restoring balance: principled under/oversampling of data for optimal classificationcited by 6
- 2024A replica analysis of under-baggingcited by 4
- 2025A statistical physics framework for optimal learningcited by 3
- 2025The Effect of Optimal Self-Distillation in Noisy Gaussian Mixture Modelcited by 2
- 2024When resampling/reweighting improves feature learning in imbalanced classification?: A toy-model studycited by 1
- 2025When majority rules, minority loses: bias amplification of gradient descentcited by 1
- 2026High-Dimensional Asymptotics and Dataset Selection for Private Transfer Learningcited by 0
- 2026High-Dimensional Asymptotics and Dataset Selection for Private Transfer Learning1 Oct 2026
- 2025A statistical physics framework for optimal learning10 Jul 2025
- 2025When majority rules, minority loses: bias amplification of gradient descent19 May 2025
- 2025The Effect of Optimal Self-Distillation in Noisy Gaussian Mixture Model27 Jan 2025
- 2024Optimal Protocols for Continual Learning via Statistical Physics and Control Theory26 Sep 2024
- 2024When resampling/reweighting improves feature learning in imbalanced classification?: A toy-model study9 Sep 2024
- 2024Tilting the Odds at the Lottery: the Interplay of Overparameterisation and Curricula in Neural Networks3 Jun 2024
- 2024Restoring balance: principled under/oversampling of data for optimal classification15 May 2024
- 2024A replica analysis of under-bagging15 Apr 2024